2019
DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Osteoporosis Prevention Smartphone App

Abstract: Background-The Striving to be Strong (StbS) study tested the efficacy of a multifaceted, theory based, complex osteoporosis prevention smartphone application (app). We hypothesized use of the app would improve bone mineral density and trabecular bone scores.Methods-The study was a three-group, prospective, repeated measure, longitudinal randomized trial. Baseline sample consisted of 290 healthy women between 40 and 60 years of age. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: "Striving," a dynam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 8 studies focused on improving lifestyle factors, including 2 (13%) on diet [ 48 , 63 ] and 6 (40%) on PA [ 64 - 69 ]—with 1 (7%) study on PA and diet [ 69 ] and 1 (7%) study on PA and sleep [ 68 ]. A total of 27% (4/15) of the studies focused on improving menopausal symptoms [ 70 - 73 ] such as vasomotor symptoms (eg, hot flushes and night sweats) and bone health [ 72 ]. The characteristics of two interventions (Activity and Technology [ACTIVATE] [ 67 , 68 ] and the Women’s Wellness Program [WWP] [ 69 , 73 ]) were each reported in 13% (2/15) of the studies and are described only once ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 8 studies focused on improving lifestyle factors, including 2 (13%) on diet [ 48 , 63 ] and 6 (40%) on PA [ 64 - 69 ]—with 1 (7%) study on PA and diet [ 69 ] and 1 (7%) study on PA and sleep [ 68 ]. A total of 27% (4/15) of the studies focused on improving menopausal symptoms [ 70 - 73 ] such as vasomotor symptoms (eg, hot flushes and night sweats) and bone health [ 72 ]. The characteristics of two interventions (Activity and Technology [ACTIVATE] [ 67 , 68 ] and the Women’s Wellness Program [WWP] [ 69 , 73 ]) were each reported in 13% (2/15) of the studies and are described only once ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, mobile applications have gained more widespread usage to improve the quality of healthcare, including disease screening, preparation before treatment, self-care, and disease progression monitoring. Many diseases now have a dedicated mobile application for helping patients cope with their diseases, such as dementia, 4 osteoporosis, 5 diabetes mellitus, 6 burns, 7 heart disease, 8 hypertension, 9 and asthma. 10 For the successful treatment of hyperthyroidism by radioactive iodine, the important part is not only the administrative dose of radioactive iodine but also good knowledge regarding the disease and the well-planned preparation of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publications comprised feasibility studies [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], design and development articles [40][41][42][61][62][63], and case studies [43][44][45][46][47]. Among these studies, 41% (13/32) of articles were RCTs [36,37,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. Although most of the articles have a direct relation to osteoporosis [31,[40][41][42]49,52,57,[61][62][63], some of the selected articles refer to apps that are useful and indirectly related to osteoporosis; that is, they are not specifically designed for osteoporosis yet can be potentially useful in managing the disease [32,33,[35][36]…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 6% (2/32) of studies measured BMD T score at baseline and after 20 weeks [52] and 12 months [48] of using the apps. After initiation, a slight decrease in the mean BMD T score was observed in one of the studies (Hedges g -0.084, 95% CI -0.461 to 0.293) [52], and a slight increase was reported in another study (Hedges g 0.108, 95% CI -0.106 to 0.322) [48]. The overall change in mean T score was not significant (Hedges g 0.06, 95% CI -1.00 to 1.12; Z=0.702; P=.48), with no heterogeneity (Q=0.810; p Q =0.368; I 2 =0; Figure 5A).…”
Section: Bmd T Scorementioning
confidence: 99%