1992
DOI: 10.1016/0300-9572(92)90175-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of out of hospital defibrillation by ambulance technicians using automated external defibrillators. The Heartstart Scotland Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, 34% of patients in the test group did not receive defibrillation. The ambulances were equipped with automated defibrillators, which have been shown to administer shocks in 90-94% of patients in ventricular fibrillation 12. Therefore, the reason for not defibrillating in most cases was probably the presence of asystole or pulseless electrical activity (electromechanical dissociation) rather than inappropriate management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, 34% of patients in the test group did not receive defibrillation. The ambulances were equipped with automated defibrillators, which have been shown to administer shocks in 90-94% of patients in ventricular fibrillation 12. Therefore, the reason for not defibrillating in most cases was probably the presence of asystole or pulseless electrical activity (electromechanical dissociation) rather than inappropriate management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated external defibrillators have been installed in all emergency ambulances in Scotland since 1988-9, and the protocol and immediate outcome of resuscitations undertaken by the Scottish Ambulance Service have been reported 5 6 7. We determined the short and long term survival of patients after initially successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest out of hospital in Scotland and identified predictors of mortality after discharge from hospital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experience to date (detailed below) has consistently demonstrated excellent sensitivity for the detection of VF, as well as specificity for the detection of rhythms not requiring shock therapy (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Sensitivity for VF detection ranges from 96% to 100%, and specificity for non-VF rhythms is near 100% in various cardiac arrest situations (9)(10)(11)(12). On rare occasions, low-amplitude, fine VF was not detected by the AED.…”
Section: Aed Technologymentioning
confidence: 92%