2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04038.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Pamidronate in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I

Abstract: Pamidronate may be a useful treatment option in the management of patients with CRPS Type I. Although treatment response was variable, the majority of patients improved. Early administration in tandem with other treatment measures is recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
83
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The review did not apply up to date systematic review methodology, did not search all relevant electronic databases and was incomplete in respect to quality assessment. Since electronic searches were limited to 2003 they missed two studies (Manicourt et al 2004;Robinson et al 2004) out of which one study contributed data to our meta-analysis (Manicourt et al 2004). On the other hand, Chauvineau and colleagues included two studies that we excluded from our analysis.…”
Section: Results In Light Of Existing Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The review did not apply up to date systematic review methodology, did not search all relevant electronic databases and was incomplete in respect to quality assessment. Since electronic searches were limited to 2003 they missed two studies (Manicourt et al 2004;Robinson et al 2004) out of which one study contributed data to our meta-analysis (Manicourt et al 2004). On the other hand, Chauvineau and colleagues included two studies that we excluded from our analysis.…”
Section: Results In Light Of Existing Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full text assessment resulted in exclusion of 12 additional studies. In total four trials were included in this review (Adami et al 1997;Varenna et al 2000;Manicourt et al 2004;Robinson et al 2004). (For study selection details please see figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations