Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BackgroundExisting literature has questioned the sensitivity of patch testing (PT) with cotrimoxazole (CTX) in the study of drug hypersensitivity.ObjectivesAssess the sensitivity of PT with CTX in non‐immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR).Patients/Materials/MethodsRetrospective analysis (2000–2022) of PT with an antibiotic series including CTX 10% pet (Chemotechnique Diagnostics©) performed according to ESCD guidelines in patients with suspected non‐immediate CADR reactions to CTX. Some patients were additionally tested with in‐house preparations of CTX from Bactrim DS® tablets at 10% in pet or water and trimethoprim 10% pet (Laboratórios Edol©).ResultsSixty‐four patients (48F/16M; mean age 47 ± 18) were included, mostly with maculopapular exanthema (51, 80%). Notably, CTX was sole suspect in 24 patients. There was no positive reaction to CTX at 10% from Chemotechnique or Bactrim DS® tablets prepared at 10% pet for patch testing. One patient reacted exclusively to trimethoprim with 1+ reaction. Two patients had a faint reaction (1+) only with the powder of Bactrim DS® tablets in water at D2, but as the reactions faded completely in 24 or 48 h, they were interpreted as irritant non‐specific reactions.ConclusionThese findings suggest that patch testing may lack sufficient sensitivity to diagnose CTX‐induced non‐immediate CADR. Therefore, clinicians should be cautious interpreting CTX patch test results.
BackgroundExisting literature has questioned the sensitivity of patch testing (PT) with cotrimoxazole (CTX) in the study of drug hypersensitivity.ObjectivesAssess the sensitivity of PT with CTX in non‐immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR).Patients/Materials/MethodsRetrospective analysis (2000–2022) of PT with an antibiotic series including CTX 10% pet (Chemotechnique Diagnostics©) performed according to ESCD guidelines in patients with suspected non‐immediate CADR reactions to CTX. Some patients were additionally tested with in‐house preparations of CTX from Bactrim DS® tablets at 10% in pet or water and trimethoprim 10% pet (Laboratórios Edol©).ResultsSixty‐four patients (48F/16M; mean age 47 ± 18) were included, mostly with maculopapular exanthema (51, 80%). Notably, CTX was sole suspect in 24 patients. There was no positive reaction to CTX at 10% from Chemotechnique or Bactrim DS® tablets prepared at 10% pet for patch testing. One patient reacted exclusively to trimethoprim with 1+ reaction. Two patients had a faint reaction (1+) only with the powder of Bactrim DS® tablets in water at D2, but as the reactions faded completely in 24 or 48 h, they were interpreted as irritant non‐specific reactions.ConclusionThese findings suggest that patch testing may lack sufficient sensitivity to diagnose CTX‐induced non‐immediate CADR. Therefore, clinicians should be cautious interpreting CTX patch test results.
Background: The lack of standardized skin test products to determine a patient's (hyper-) sensitivity to medications has required physicians to empirically develop their own testing procedures. These approaches include puncture and intradermal skin tests, patch tests and medication challenges. Desensitization protocols are also frequently used when the necessity of a particular medication is urgent. Objective: This study surveyed drug hypersensitivity testing and desensitization practices reported in 3 allergy journals, over a 5-year period 2004-2008. Methods: This survey collected reports of skin tests, challenges, and desensitization to medications, vaccines, and diagnostic agents in 3 leading allergy journals. Studies were included if they reported sufficient detail that the reader could reasonably be expected to reproduce the technique reported. We did not include reports of in vitro testing because the ability of the individual practitioner to perform these tests may be limited. Results: Data for 191 drugs were sufficiently detailed to include. Testing with antimicrobial agents was reported most frequently; and several newer classes of medications such as monoclonal antibodies and interferons are also included. Skin testing to detect medication allergy was the most commonly reported technique; however there were numerous drug challenge and drug desensitization schedules used in practice. Conclusion: Beyond testing for medications such as antibiotics, corticosteroids and local anesthetics skin testing, challenge, and desensitization schedules have been described for numerous other medication classes. The variety of these schedules is likely driven both by the needs of clinical practice and the lack of standardized skin test preparations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.