2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of pirfenidone and disease severity of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Extended analysis of phase III trial in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showing the higher efficacy of pirfenidone in the advanced group might be associated with a more rapid decline in FVC before treatment in the advanced group than in the non-advanced group. However, Taguchi et al[25], in an extended analysis of a Japanese phase 3 trial of pirfenidone, suggested that pirfenidone exerted better therapeutic effects in patients with milder IPF; pirfenidone markedly attenuated vital capacity (VC) decline (relative difference with placebo: 74.1%, p = 0.045) in patients with mild IPF compared with its effects in moderate (35.2%) or severe IPF (27.0%). However, they defined the severity of IPF using baseline % FVC, oxygen saturation on exertion, and % DLco (Shah’s classification), and the severe group showed moderate lung function impairment (mean VC: 66.4 ± 17.6%, mean DLco: 39.2 ± 12.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showing the higher efficacy of pirfenidone in the advanced group might be associated with a more rapid decline in FVC before treatment in the advanced group than in the non-advanced group. However, Taguchi et al[25], in an extended analysis of a Japanese phase 3 trial of pirfenidone, suggested that pirfenidone exerted better therapeutic effects in patients with milder IPF; pirfenidone markedly attenuated vital capacity (VC) decline (relative difference with placebo: 74.1%, p = 0.045) in patients with mild IPF compared with its effects in moderate (35.2%) or severe IPF (27.0%). However, they defined the severity of IPF using baseline % FVC, oxygen saturation on exertion, and % DLco (Shah’s classification), and the severe group showed moderate lung function impairment (mean VC: 66.4 ± 17.6%, mean DLco: 39.2 ± 12.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although prophylactic medications such as proton pump inhibitors for gastrointestinal AE were reportedly effective for long‐term intake of pirfenidone, these medications were not enough to prevent gastrointestinal AE in the present study. Regarding administered dose of pirfenidone, 1200 mg (low dose) of pirfenidone has been shown to decrease the decline in vital capacity to the same extent as 1800 mg (high dose) in Japanese patients with IPF . Therefore, lower doses of pirfenidone may reduce pirfenidone‐related AE and ensure continuous and effective treatment, even in patients with advanced IPF, although the precise dose adjustment strategy for pirfenidone has not yet been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety profiles were comparable between the two patient populations (U. Costabel, Ruhrlandklinik, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; personal communication). Furthermore, preliminary data from observational studies by other groups have suggested a similar efficacy of pirfenidone in severe IPF [28][29][30][31][32][33]; however, the results were quite preliminary.…”
Section: Pirfenidone and Nintedanib: What Role In Severe Ipf?mentioning
confidence: 95%