2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02603-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study concluded that additional use of PRP did not lead to further significant improvement in patients compared to traditional graft techniques and that PRP may have a limited role in enhancing spinal fusion. However, several other retrospective and meta-analyses have confirmed the role of PRP in promoting new bone formation and bone fusion ( 102 , 103 ). In a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate PRP efficacy after posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery, Kubota et al.…”
Section: Application Of Prp In Spine Surgerymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study concluded that additional use of PRP did not lead to further significant improvement in patients compared to traditional graft techniques and that PRP may have a limited role in enhancing spinal fusion. However, several other retrospective and meta-analyses have confirmed the role of PRP in promoting new bone formation and bone fusion ( 102 , 103 ). In a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate PRP efficacy after posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery, Kubota et al.…”
Section: Application Of Prp In Spine Surgerymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The study concluded that additional use of PRP did not lead to further significant improvement in patients compared to traditional graft techniques and that PRP may have a limited role in enhancing spinal fusion. However, several other retrospective and metaanalyses have confirmed the role of PRP in promoting new bone formation and bone fusion (102,103). In a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate PRP efficacy after posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery, Kubota et al randomly divided 62 patients into PRP and control groups; the final bone union rate, fusion area, and mean union time in the PRP group were significantly better than those of the control group at the end of follow-up period (104).…”
Section: Treatment Of Spinal Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, at a clinical setting, PRP and autograft bone chip induced higher fusion rates than those of the latter alone 124) . Recently, a metaanalysis suggested that fusion rate is unaffected by the addition of PRP, yet improvement of back pain and faster bone union can be achieved 125) . These results are challenged by another meta-analysis that found no difference in quality of life but lower chance of successful fusion with PRP 126) .…”
Section: Prp and Spinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is blood plasma containing concentrated autologous platelets containing several growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) [5][6][7]. Therefore, PRP is used to accelerate bone and soft tissue healing not only in oral dentistry, dermatology, ophthalmology, and sports medicine, but also in spinal fusion surgery [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%