2020
DOI: 10.1186/s43166-020-00008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injection in mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: randomized control study

Abstract: Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy. Typical symptoms and signs include numbness, tingling, pain, or burning sensation in the digits supplied by the median nerve and/or nocturnal paresthesia. Treatments of CTS range from conservative measures to surgical decompression of the median nerve. Results: The PRP group showed a statistically significant reduction in the visual analog scale, Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, for the severity and the fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The follow-up time was only 10 weeks (Raeissadat et al, 2018), which is less than that in other studies, and a delayed effect of PRP was reported in the relevant literature (Wu et al, 2017a;Gado and El-Banna, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. The follow-up time was only 10 weeks (Raeissadat et al, 2018), which is less than that in other studies, and a delayed effect of PRP was reported in the relevant literature (Wu et al, 2017a;Gado and El-Banna, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…And in a related study, which confirms our speculation, compared to the study of Raeissadat et al, Gado et al used ultrasound-guided injection using an in-plane ulnar approach; the puncture needle was passed from the ulnar side of the wrist joint to the MN, and 2 mL of PRP was injected, and the flexor supporting band of nerves was stripped with water, and the remaining 1 mL of PRP was injected underneath the MN, and evaluated the results of the treatment in 40 patients (PRP + S group 20 patients and splint group 20 patients) at 3-month follow-up, and their results showed that the differences in VAS, SSS, FSS and CSA between the two groups at 1 month after treatment were not statistically significant; however, patients in the PRP combined with brace group showed better improvement in all of the above indexes than those in the brace-only group at 3 months after treatment ( Gado and El-Banna, 2020 ), indicating that there is a delayed effect of PRP and that PRP injection dose of 3 mL is better than 1 mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%