Background: The ideal anesthetic drug choice for local infiltration anesthesia under monitored anesthesia care must provide a bloodless surgical field, along with analgesia and comfort for patients. We hypothesized that dexemedetomidine can provide better visibility of the surgical field at a higher dose of 1 µg/kg than 0.5 µg/kg, along with providing sedation and analgesia.Methods: After institutional ethics committee clearance and written informed consent, this prospective, randomized, triple blind study was conducted on ninety patients of either gender between 18 and 65 years who were scheduled for tympanoplasty under local infiltrative block and monitored anesthesia care. The patients were randomly assigned to either the dexmedetomidine (DEX) 0.5 group, who received a 10 ml solution containing 2% lignocaine and 0.5 µg/kg DEX, or the DEX 1.0 group, who received a 10 ml solution containing 2% lignocaine and 1 µg/kg DEX. The operative surgeon performed local infiltration using a specified and standardized 5-point infiltration technique around the auricle. The primary objective of this study was to compare the intraoperative bleeding at the surgical site by Boezzart’s scale. The comparison of normally distributed variables was conducted using the Student's t-test, whereas the comparison of non-normally distributed variables was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The analysis of qualitative data was conducted using the chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: The overall bleeding score was significantly higher in the DEX 0.5 group (3.21 ± 0.727) than the DEX 1.0 group (1.43 ± 0.661) (P value < 0.001). The time to first analgesic requirement and surgeon satisfaction score were also significantly higher in the DEX 1.0 group.Conclusions: The combination of DEX at a dose of 1 µg/kg along with 2% lignocaine could potentially be considered the optimal choice for infiltration during tympanoplasty performed under monitored anesthetic care.