2012
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Preerythrocytic and Blood-Stage Malaria Vaccines Can Be Assessed in Small Sporozoite Challenge Trials in Human Volunteers

Abstract: The development of a vaccine against malaria has public health priority. In a controlled setting, preliminary data on the efficacy of Plasmodium falciparum vaccine candidates can be obtained by exposing immunized human volunteers to the bites of laboratory-reared P. falciparum-infected mosquitoes. Using empirical data, we show that these trials, with small numbers of volunteers, are sufficiently powered to detect protective biological effects induced by preerythrocytic and/or blood-stage candidate vaccines if … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
40
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
40
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, P. falciparum lysate-seropositive Tanzanians had a lower parasite load at the time of first detection by qPCR and at the time of the first peak of parasite load than seronegative Tanzanians. The first peak of blood-stage parasitemia can be used as a proxy for parasite liver load (16,35). Our results might therefore indicate the emergence of fewer parasites from the liver and hence better control of either initiation or progression of liver-stage infection in preexposed individuals within the Tanzanian cohort and in Tanzanians than in the Dutch cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, P. falciparum lysate-seropositive Tanzanians had a lower parasite load at the time of first detection by qPCR and at the time of the first peak of parasite load than seronegative Tanzanians. The first peak of blood-stage parasitemia can be used as a proxy for parasite liver load (16,35). Our results might therefore indicate the emergence of fewer parasites from the liver and hence better control of either initiation or progression of liver-stage infection in preexposed individuals within the Tanzanian cohort and in Tanzanians than in the Dutch cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In line with such an effect of preexisting antisporozoite immunity would be the observation that those Tanzanian volunteers with a longer prepatancy by qPCR also had higher baseline antibody titers against the sporozoite antigen CSP. However, the first detection by qPCR in both the Dutch and Tanzanians after intradermal PfSPZ injection was uncharacteristically late compared to that for infection by mosquito bite routinely conducted in The Netherlands and elsewhere (11,16,18,19,23,24,35). This is likely due to less efficient liver-stage infection by this route and hence a low initial blood-stage load that reaches the qPCR detection limit only later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One immunized subject developed parasitemia on day 21 after sporozoite challenge, as retrospectively detected by qPCR. The blood-stage parasite multiplication rate after controlled human malaria infection in malaria-naïve subjects is 10.9 on average, but may be as low as 2 (17). With a multiplication rate of 2, a load of 457 parasites per milliliter on day 21 would be the result of an estimated 9,000 merozoites released from the liver (i.e., one infected hepatocyte).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a CHMI study, participants are infected with parasites delivered via three alternative routes: with sporozoites via mosquito bite (Chulay et al 1986;Roestenberg et al 2012); via needle-based inoculation of cryopreserved sporozoites (Epstein 2013); or via thawed cryopreserved, infected red blood cells (Lawrence et al 2000;Pombo et al 2002;Duncan et al 2011). CHMI by mosquito bite challenge has been the most widely adopted, and provides a cost-effective, highly reproducible assessment of vaccine candidates for their efficacy against infection.…”
Section: Innovation For Discovery Of New Targets and Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%