2022
DOI: 10.1080/09064710.2021.2003852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of rhizobia strains on growth and chemical composition of cancer bush ( Sutherlandia frutescens )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the commercial inoculant employed in the study failed to elicit nodulation in L. frutescens leading to low biomass production even though this inoculant has commonly been used for L. frutescens. For example, contrary to the findings of this study, Masenya et al [24] and Makgato et al [25] demonstrated the potential of the commercial inoculant in improving the yield, phytochemicals and antioxidant activities in L. frutescens. The insufficient yield observed in the negative and positive control plants resulted in the lack of data for the other tests conducted on the plants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the commercial inoculant employed in the study failed to elicit nodulation in L. frutescens leading to low biomass production even though this inoculant has commonly been used for L. frutescens. For example, contrary to the findings of this study, Masenya et al [24] and Makgato et al [25] demonstrated the potential of the commercial inoculant in improving the yield, phytochemicals and antioxidant activities in L. frutescens. The insufficient yield observed in the negative and positive control plants resulted in the lack of data for the other tests conducted on the plants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the unexpected performance of the commercial inoculant in the current study can be attributed to possible incompatibility between the strain and the host L. frutescens. As the present study was carried out under sterile conditions, the studies by Masenya et al [24] and Makgato et al [25] may have benefited from the native soil microbial population rather than the inoculant. At the same time, Gerding et al [27] hinted at the susceptibility of Lessertia species to ineffective nodulation by some Rhizobium bacterial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Masenya and colleagues [ 13 ] compared the efficacy of native rhizobia strains for L. frutescens and commercial inoculum formulated from Bradyrhizobium and Rhizobium symbionts. The native symbionts exhibited superior plant growth parameters and symbiotic effectiveness when compared to the commercial strains.…”
Section: Growth and Phytochemical Enhancement In Lessertia ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beneficial microbes in the rhizosphere promote plant growth through several mechanisms that include the solubilization or release of nutrient elements from sparingly available sources [ 22 ]. For example, in legumes such as L. frutescens , Nitrogen (N 2 ) fixation in association with plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria called rhizobia can supply the plants N 2 requirements for growth [ 13 ]. Broadly put, plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are soil bacteria with the ability to regulate plant growth and development directly or indirectly [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer bush is a small, attractive, perennial woody shrub that grows up to 1 m long (Gibson 2011). The striking scarlet flowers have made it a popular ornamental plant (Gibson 2011;Masenya et al 2022). It is also reported to be used by British botanists since the early 1990s due to its phytochemical properties (Haffajee 2002;Street and Prinsloo 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%