1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199904)19:4<318::aid-pd538>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of routine fetal ultrasound screening for congenital heart disease in Isère county, France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the published literature comes from European countries, which tend to have more centralized healthcare systems and uniform practices vis-à-vis prenatal ultrasound. 30,[37][38][39][40][41] As such, these systems may represent the best-case scenario for population prenatal ultrasound screening. In the United States, many congenital surgery referral centers have reported prenatal detection rates Ͼ50% for functional single-ventricle lesions, 35,42 although the detection rate is generally Ͻ30% for CCHD lesions with 2-ventricle circulation.…”
Section: Customary Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the published literature comes from European countries, which tend to have more centralized healthcare systems and uniform practices vis-à-vis prenatal ultrasound. 30,[37][38][39][40][41] As such, these systems may represent the best-case scenario for population prenatal ultrasound screening. In the United States, many congenital surgery referral centers have reported prenatal detection rates Ͼ50% for functional single-ventricle lesions, 35,42 although the detection rate is generally Ͻ30% for CCHD lesions with 2-ventricle circulation.…”
Section: Customary Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, regional variation in prenatal detection of CHD, with those obstetric centres close to cardiac units faring better than those situated in more remote areas (Allan et al, 1994;Bull, 1999). In screening programmes, detection rates of CHD are significantly higher if extra-cardiac malformations are present (48 vs 25% (Klein et al, 1999)) because these increase the suspicion of aneuploidy and prompt a more detailed ultrasound survey. In one series, 98% of aneuploid fetuses with CHD had extra-cardiac malformations (Tennstedt et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Несмотря на развитие детской кардиологии и кардиохирургии как области практической медицины, за последние 10-15 лет диагности-ка критических и сложно-комбинированных врожденных пороков сердца, не установленных на пренатальном этапе [6,[7][8][9][10][11], остается слож-ной задачей для неонатальных служб. Во многом такая ситуация обусловлена отсутствием в их ар-сенале доступной экспертной эхокардиографии.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified