1997
DOI: 10.3171/jns.1997.87.6.0876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in 66 patients suffering from cluster headache: a 12- to 70-month follow-up evaluation

Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, based on 12- to 70-month follow-up data, of radiofrequency (RF) lesions of the sphenopalatine ganglion made in patients suffering from cluster headache. Sixty-six patients suffering from either episodic (Group A, 56 patients) or chronic (Group B, 10 patients) cluster headache who were not responsive to pharmacological management were treated by RF lesioning in the sphenopalatine ganglion. Complete relief of pain was achieved in 34 (60.7%) of 56 patients in Gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
154
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
154
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An earlier study reported on complete pain relief in 3 out of 10 chronic cluster patients after radiofrequency lesioning of the sphenopalatine ganglion, but no relief was found in 4 patients with an average follow-up of 24 months (Sanders and Zuurmond 1997). Another study with 20 patients reported on good results, which were always temporarily (Felisati et al 2006).…”
Section: Destructive Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An earlier study reported on complete pain relief in 3 out of 10 chronic cluster patients after radiofrequency lesioning of the sphenopalatine ganglion, but no relief was found in 4 patients with an average follow-up of 24 months (Sanders and Zuurmond 1997). Another study with 20 patients reported on good results, which were always temporarily (Felisati et al 2006).…”
Section: Destructive Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Radiofrequency lesioning of the sphenopalatine ganglion can result in postoperative epistaxis, cheek hemorrhage, a lesion of the maxillary nerve and hypesthesia of the palate (Sanders and Zuurmond 1997;Narouze et al 2009). Total destruction of the sphenopalatine ganglion could result in eye dryness (Meyer et al 1970), but the radiofrequency treatment now only aims at a partial lesion of the ganglion (van Kleef et al 2009).…”
Section: Destructive Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of iontophoresis appears to be the need for only 3 outpatient treatments, as compared to the average need for up to 13 intranasal injections as described by Puig et al [5] . Percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning has been more recently explored as a therapeutic option with some promising results [6] . Sanders et al [6] investigated sphenopalatine ganglion blockade by radiofrequency lesioning in patients suffering from cluster headaches (a clinical diagnosis believed by many to be pathophysiologically related to sphenopalatine neuralgia [1,7] ) whose pains were refractory to pharmacological as well as other surgical treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning has been more recently explored as a therapeutic option with some promising results [6] . Sanders et al [6] investigated sphenopalatine ganglion blockade by radiofrequency lesioning in patients suffering from cluster headaches (a clinical diagnosis believed by many to be pathophysiologically related to sphenopalatine neuralgia [1,7] ) whose pains were refractory to pharmacological as well as other surgical treatments. The results were encouraging in that 34 of 56 (61%) episodic cluster headache patients found complete pain relief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of RFA also has been documented in the successful treatment of osteoid osteoma (Rosenthal, Hornicek, Torriani, Gebhardt, & Mankin, 2003;Woertler et al, 2001), painful bone metastases (Dupuy, Hong, Oliver, & Goldberg, 2000;Goetz et al, 2004), small renal cell tumors (< 3 cm) (Hwang et al, 2004), lung cancer (Gadaleta et al, 2004;Steinke, King, Glenn, & Morris, 2004a, 2004b, adrenals (Mayo-Smith & Dupuy, 2004;Melliza & Woodall, 2000;Wood, Abraham, Hvizda, Alexander, & Fojo, 2003) and painful soft tissue neoplasms (Locklin, Mannes, Berger, & Wood, 2004). RFA also has been used in nerve ganglia for treatment of pain syndromes such as trigeminal neuralgia (Onofrio, 1975;Oturai, Jensen, Eriksen, & Madsen, 1996), cluster headaches (Sanders & Zuurmond, 1997), chronic segmental thoracic pain (Stolker, Vervest, & Groen, 1994), cervicobrachialgia (Slappendel et al, 1997), and plantar fasciitis (Sollitto, Plotkin, Klein, & Mullin, 1997). Limited use of RFA in breast cancer (Jeffrey et al, 1999) has been documented.…”
Section: Indications and Contraindicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%