1988
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(88)90085-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of sulfur dioxide as a grain preservative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there was a 100-fold increase in the fungi population over that measured for preserved SO2-treated HMB fed at the same time (Gibson et al 1988). No fungi were identified for spoiled grain fed in this trial, nor were there screening tests performed for mycotoxins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, there was a 100-fold increase in the fungi population over that measured for preserved SO2-treated HMB fed at the same time (Gibson et al 1988). No fungi were identified for spoiled grain fed in this trial, nor were there screening tests performed for mycotoxins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The efficacy of sulfur dioxide (SO) as a grain preservative has recently been evaluated (Mathison et al 1985;Gibson et al 1988). Mathison et al (1985) (Gray 1980 (Merck 1979 (Harwig and Munro 1975 (Dufour et al 1954), milk production and body weight change (Knodt et al 1952;Dufour et al 1954) when not confounded by excessive (Stallcup 1955) or uneven SO2 application (Bratzler et al 1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus. benefits of sulphur dioxide treatment of highmoisture barley appear limited to its demonstrated role as a grain preservative (Gibson et al 1988b Thus, it appears that starch, which comprises (Perdok and Leng 1987) and so another mechanism of action must be responsible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidencethat molds may also reduce the thiamin content of grain (Loew et al 1972;citedby Blood et al (1983)) so a thiamin deficiency in the control group of cattle might have been expected. Similarly, it has been shown that sulfur dioxide treatment destroys thiamin in the grain, and in previous studies sulfur dioxide-treated grain resulted in thiamin deficiencies in cattle (Gibson et al 1988a;Mathison etal. 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%