2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502013000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of surgical versus conservative treatment in esophageal perforation: a systematic review of case series studies

Abstract: PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment for esophageal perforation. METHODS:A systematic review of the literature was performed. We conducted a search strategy in the main electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase and Lilacs to identify all case series. RESULTS:Thirty three case series met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1417 participants. The predominant etiology was iatrogenic (54.2%) followed by spontaneous cause (20.4%) and in 66.1% the localization was thoracic. In 65.4% and 33.4% … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
29
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Non- operative management, in appropriate patients, can be used in selected patients. Similar results were recorded by the Houston group [21] and two recent meta-analyses [22,23]. …”
Section: Injuries To the Thoracic Oesophagussupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Non- operative management, in appropriate patients, can be used in selected patients. Similar results were recorded by the Houston group [21] and two recent meta-analyses [22,23]. …”
Section: Injuries To the Thoracic Oesophagussupporting
confidence: 89%
“…An aggressive surgical approach is believed to be the most effective way to remove the septic focus and prevent further contamination [4,5]. Despite its perceived advantage surgical therapy continues to be associated with high mortality rates [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its perceived advantage surgical therapy continues to be associated with high mortality rates [4,5]. There has also been a growing interest in the use of covered stents to treat esophageal perforations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of an esophageal perforation mainly relies on radiographic evidence. The esophagogram is considered to be the gold standard examination with which to establish the diagnosis of esophageal lesions and can reveal a contrast leak in most cases of esophageal perforation [Hasimoto et al 2013;Kiss, 2008]. It is important to mention that esophagograms can produce false negatives by up to 10-25% [Flynn et al 1989].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%