2009
DOI: 10.1159/000233234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Systemic Treatments for Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Aims: To compare the efficacy of psoriasis treatments through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Methods: Randomized controlled trials evaluating the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were identified and assessed for quality. PASI responses were modeled using a mixed-treatment comparison, which enabled the estimation of the relative effectiveness of several treatments. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Twenty-two trials were included. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Efficacy and outcomes were not analyzed, but they have been shown previously to be similar between TNF blockers. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The model included an adjustment for the cost of copayment and dispensing fees and did not consider the cost to a plan that uses coinsurance. This approach, combined with the fact that all patients in the analysis were continuously enrolled in a managed care plan, may limit the generalizability of these results in patients who are not enrolled in managed care plans.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficacy and outcomes were not analyzed, but they have been shown previously to be similar between TNF blockers. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The model included an adjustment for the cost of copayment and dispensing fees and did not consider the cost to a plan that uses coinsurance. This approach, combined with the fact that all patients in the analysis were continuously enrolled in a managed care plan, may limit the generalizability of these results in patients who are not enrolled in managed care plans.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since biological agents were introduced for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown substantial benefits of these treatments; both in terms of clinical skin involvement [1,2] and in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) [3,4,5]. RCTs are the gold standard for testing efficacy and safety in evidence-based medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, expression of CD26 on the surface of keratinocytes and T cells in psoriatic skin is upregulated [4]. Methotrexate, cyclosporine and retinoids have been used as conventional systemic treatments in psoriasis, but are not fully effective [5]. Recently, biologics such as TNF-α inhibitors and ustekinumab, have been introduced for the treatment of psoriasis as they inhibit T cell activation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%