2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-016-0955-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis with Sodium Hyaluronate in the Management of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Abstract: Although patients benefitted from both techniques, arthrocentesis with injection of SH seemed to be superior to arthrocentesis alone.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors concluded that the type of medicament used during arthrocentesis had no impact on the final outcome. Contrary to those results, Gorrela et al [83] found that the intensity of pain was significantly decreased in the group with sodium hyaluronate injection compared to the group with arthrocentesis alone. However, it should be noted that the authors analyzed the results after a shorter period of time (6 months).…”
Section: Arthrocentesis With Hyaluronic Acidmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The authors concluded that the type of medicament used during arthrocentesis had no impact on the final outcome. Contrary to those results, Gorrela et al [83] found that the intensity of pain was significantly decreased in the group with sodium hyaluronate injection compared to the group with arthrocentesis alone. However, it should be noted that the authors analyzed the results after a shorter period of time (6 months).…”
Section: Arthrocentesis With Hyaluronic Acidmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Treatment with arthrocentesis is very effective and the results are comparable to arthroscopy or arthrotomy. The success of arthrocentesis is indicated in 70-80 % of cases, which is comparable to arthroscopy (more than an 80 % success rate) (9,11,15,25,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It was also important that well-defined physical examination techniques such as the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) (36) or other validated techniques were used to identify the presence or absence of signs and symptoms that defined the patient sample. In our review of 31 published RCTs, some studies had no inclusion or exclusion criteria (2,14,33) or used a diagnosis of disk displacement with or without reduction as the inclusion criteria without reporting the exclusion of other pain sources such as masticatory muscle myalgia (3)(4)(5)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)15,17,18,(20)(21)(22)24,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). Only a few RCTs confirmed the source of pain was from TMJ innervated structures by either the use of a local anesthetic to anesthetize the auriculotemporal nerve and eliminating the TMJ pain (6) or by selectively loading the TMJ by contralateral biting and duplicating the intracapsular source of pain within the joint (19).…”
Section: Identifying the Appropriate Patient To Test Tmj Arthrocentesis Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important inclusion criterion that was used in some RCTs of TMJ arthrocentesis was unilateral TMJ pain (3,14,16,18,19,22,23,25,29,31,32). Since all of the studies used pain as one of the primary or secondary outcome measures, the inclusion of bilateral TMJ pain would have been problematic if the treatment was only applied to the joint with the highest level of pain and residual pain continued in the opposite joint or if both TMJs were treated and only one was successfully managed.…”
Section: Identifying the Appropriate Patient To Test Tmj Arthrocentesis Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation