1997
DOI: 10.1177/112070009700700104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Two Types of Femoral Cement Restrictor in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract: Distal occlusion of the femoral canal in total hip arthroplasty is important for cement pressurisation. Failure to adequately restrict cement may result in earlier prosthetic loosening and a longer column of distal cement which may make revision surgery more difficult. A standard plastic restrictor (Hardinge type) was compared with a bone plug restriction method in a randomised, prospective trial of 50 patients. Both types of restrictor failed to adequately restrict cement in over 50% of cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless the femoral canal is sufficiently sealed with some type of restrictor, this basic requirement will not be fulfilled and prosthetic loosening may be expected at an early stage (Oh et al 1978, Jeffery 1997.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unless the femoral canal is sufficiently sealed with some type of restrictor, this basic requirement will not be fulfilled and prosthetic loosening may be expected at an early stage (Oh et al 1978, Jeffery 1997.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several materials and designs have been used for femoral canal closure (Jeffery 1997, Harris and McGann 1986, Bulstra et al 1996. Most of these are nonresorbable and difficulties in removing the restrictor in revision cases have been reported (Northmore-Ball et al 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%