Efficacy of wrist robot-aided orthopedic rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background In recent years, many studies focused on the use of robotic devices for both the assessment and the neuro-motor reeducation of upper limb in subjects after stroke, spinal cord injuries or affected by neurological disorders. Contrarily, it is still hard to find examples of robot-aided assessment and rehabilitation after traumatic injuries in the orthopedic field. However, those benefits related to the use of robotic devices are expected also in orthopedic functional reeducation. Methods After a wrist injury occurred at their workplace, wrist functionality of twenty-three subjects was evaluated through a robot-based assessment and clinical measures (Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation, Jebsen-Taylor and Jamar Test), before and after a 3-week long rehabilitative treatment. Subjects were randomized in two groups: while the control group (n = 13) underwent a traditional rehabilitative protocol, the experimental group (n = 10) was treated replacing traditional exercises with robot-aided ones. Results Functionality, assessed through the function subscale of PRWE scale, improved in both groups (experimental p = 0.016; control p < 0.001) and was comparable between groups, both pre (U = 45.5, p = 0.355) and post (U = 47, p = 0.597) treatment. Additionally, even though groups’ performance during the robotic assessment was comparable before the treatment (U = 36, p = 0.077), after rehabilitation the experimental group presented better results than the control one (U = 26, p = 0.015). Conclusions This work can be considered a starting point for introducing the use of robotic devices in the orthopedic field. The robot-aided rehabilitative treatment was effective and comparable to the traditional one. Preserving efficacy and safety conditions, a systematic use of these devices could lead to decrease human therapists’ effort, increase repeatability and accuracy of assessments, and promote subject’s engagement and voluntary participation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT04739644. Registered on February 4, 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04739644.

Preliminary Evaluation of an Adaptive Robotic Training Program of the Wrist for Persons with Multiple Sclerosis

“…Motors locked the supination and pronation plane in the neutral position. Since the size of the tracking figure was not meant to challenge the participant, it was scaled to a maximum of 80% of the individual's active ROM collected in T0 [24]. The active ROM was evaluated in 2 planes (flexion/extension, radial/ulnar deviation) and the smallest value was chosen to scale the figure.…”

A Dynamic Submaximal Fatigue Protocol Alters Wrist Biomechanical Properties and Proprioception

“…The experimental setup involved the WristBot ( Masia et al, 2009 ; Iandolo et al, 2019 ), a robotic manipulandum currently employed in motor control and human wrist rehabilitation studies ( Albanese et al, 2021c ; Mannella et al, 2021 ). This robotic device allows wrist movements along three degrees of freedom (DoF): flexion-extension (FE), radial-ulnar deviation (RUD), and pronation-supination (PS), with a range of motion along each DoF comparable to humans.…”

μ-band desynchronization in the contralateral central and central-parietal areas predicts proprioceptive acuity

“…Proprioception is the sensory mechanism that allows humans to perceive body position and movement ( Proske and Gandevia, 2012 ). It is essential for motor control and its decline due to neurological disorders or orthopedic injuries ( Albanese et al, 2021b ) can severely affect the human motor functions. Analysis of movements performed without vision by patients with large-fiber sensory neuropathy have demonstrated higher variability of limb position or force exerted than control subjects ( Rothwell et al, 1982 ; Sanes et al, 1985 ; Forget and Lamarre, 1987 ; Ghez et al, 1990 ).…”