2023
DOI: 10.1177/03331024231151419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy, safety and indirect comparisons of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature

Abstract: Background We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to study the efficacy and safety of newly developed drugs for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. Methods MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 11 February 2022. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials examining all formulations of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of adults with migraine, were included. Data were extracted following the PRISMA guideli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, the so-called gepants, were developed: for the treatment of acute migraine attacks, rimegepant 75 mg, ubrogepant 50 and 100 mg and zavegepant nasal spray 10 mg. There are no significant differences in the efficacy of the three gepants, and the 95% confidence intervals of the odds ratios overlap (Table 1) (9). Unfortunately, there are no direct comparative studies between triptans, analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the approved gepants.…”
Section: A Critical Appraisal: Therapy Of the Acute Migraine Attackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, the so-called gepants, were developed: for the treatment of acute migraine attacks, rimegepant 75 mg, ubrogepant 50 and 100 mg and zavegepant nasal spray 10 mg. There are no significant differences in the efficacy of the three gepants, and the 95% confidence intervals of the odds ratios overlap (Table 1) (9). Unfortunately, there are no direct comparative studies between triptans, analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the approved gepants.…”
Section: A Critical Appraisal: Therapy Of the Acute Migraine Attackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Headache Society deems, therefore, that the composition of the author groups will provide a presentation of the efficacy and potential side effects or safety aspects of the new drugs for the treatment of acute migraine attacks and for the prevention of migraine that is as objective as possible and can be used for clinical practice. In addition to meta-analyses of efficacy and tolerability or safety for both acute and preventive medications (13), some of the publications address practical aspects of use, such as migraine prevention in patients with medication overuse or medication overuse headache (4), the results of open-label long-term studies for both drugs for acute therapy (5) and for migraine prophylaxis (6), and other aspects such as nonresponders to previous therapies, combination therapy switching, and termination of therapy (7,8).…”
Section: New Drugs For the Acute Treatment Of Migraine Attacks And Fo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine Literatursuche analysierte die offenen Langzeitund Praxisstudien zu Lasmiditan, Ubrogepant und Rimegepant für die Akutbehandlung von Migräneattacken [19]. Die Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit aller 3 Substanzen blieben über einen längeren Zeitraum erhalten.…”
Section: Merkeunclassified