1989
DOI: 10.1097/00004850-198901000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Raclopride, a Specific D2 Receptor Blocker, in Acute Schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although raclopride is currently not used as an antipsychotic in the clinic, it clearly displays antipsychotic activity. Thus, open label clinical trials have reported that raclopride (4-16 mg/day) showed good antipsychotic efficacy (patients were rated "very much", or "much", improved), was well tolerated, and had a relatively safe side effect profile (Farde et al 1988b;Cookson et al 1989). Furthermore, in addition to its antipsychotic-like effects in the CAR test, raclopride (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) also dose-dependently reverses apomorphine-induced disruption of the prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex, PPI, in rats (Swerdlow et al 1991;Varty and Higgins 1995;Wadenberg and Pais, unpublished data), another screening test for antipsychotic activity (see Swerdlow and Geyer 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although raclopride is currently not used as an antipsychotic in the clinic, it clearly displays antipsychotic activity. Thus, open label clinical trials have reported that raclopride (4-16 mg/day) showed good antipsychotic efficacy (patients were rated "very much", or "much", improved), was well tolerated, and had a relatively safe side effect profile (Farde et al 1988b;Cookson et al 1989). Furthermore, in addition to its antipsychotic-like effects in the CAR test, raclopride (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) also dose-dependently reverses apomorphine-induced disruption of the prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex, PPI, in rats (Swerdlow et al 1991;Varty and Higgins 1995;Wadenberg and Pais, unpublished data), another screening test for antipsychotic activity (see Swerdlow and Geyer 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risperidone and the three benzamides, compounds with established clinical e¦cacy as antipsychotics (risperidone: Borison et al 1992;amisulpride: Delcker et al 1990;raclopride: Farde et al 1988;Cookson et al 1989;remoxipride: Den Boer et al 1990;Hebenstreit et al 1991) failed to potentiate PPI, whereas prazosin, an antihypertensive drug (Reid and Vincent 1986) with no demonstrated antipsychotic activity, enhanced PPI. These four false negatives (risperidone and the benzamides) and the false positive (prazosin) indicate that this PPI-potentiation test does not possess a very good predictive validity to screen for antipsychotics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has two specific goals: (1) to determine the effects of subchronic and chronic treatment with a typical antipsychotic (haloperidol) on the three ionotropic glutamate receptor subtypes and (2) to compare the changes in glutamate receptor subtype binding induced by haloperidol to any possible changes in the same receptor subtype following subchronic and chronic treatment with the atypical antipsychotic (clozapine), the dopamine D 2 /D 3 receptor antagonist (raclopride) which exhibits antipsychotic activity (Farde et al 1988;Cookson et al 1989), or the dopamine D 1 (D 1 /D 5 ) receptor antagonist (SCH23390). Similar changes in a specific glutamate receptor level, as quantified by in vitro receptor autoradiography, within a specific brain region during chronic treatment with both typical and atypical antipsychotics may indicate it as a locus for the drug's antipsychotic action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%