1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80022-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, versus nifedipine GITS in patients with essential hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean baseline values of total PGWB were compa-rable with those found in other studies of hypertensives in Europe and the US 19,20,29,39 and the subscale means tallied with those found at baseline in a similar study. 13 The favourable effects of enalapril compared with eprosartan on self-control and total score were seen at study end point but not at monotherapy end point.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Mean baseline values of total PGWB were compa-rable with those found in other studies of hypertensives in Europe and the US 19,20,29,39 and the subscale means tallied with those found at baseline in a similar study. 13 The favourable effects of enalapril compared with eprosartan on self-control and total score were seen at study end point but not at monotherapy end point.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This assertion is supported by findings of a substudy of LIFE in hypertensive patients with LVH in which losartan was superior to the beta blocker atenolol in reducing the risk of cardiovascular complications of ISH, particularly stroke. Losartan's documented CV outcomes benefits in the ISH cohort of the LIFE study 76 and its excellent tolerability (alone or in combination with HCTZ) compared with other principal classes of antihypertensive agents, as consistently reproduced in different studies and populations, 72,[87][88][89][90] are likely to have important therapeutic ramifications for the management of SBP. A high degree of tolerability is especially important with respect to patients with systolic hypertension since these patients often require more than one antihypertensive agent to attain the target blood pressures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…72 In several clinical trials, losartan has been shown to be better tolerated than many other types of antihypertensive agents, including calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, and beta blockers, particularly with respect to oedema, cough, and fatigue. [87][88][89][90] In an analysis of 2900 hypertensive patients enrolled in double-blind trials, losartan alone or losartan in combination with HCTZ was well tolerated, with a similar percentage of patients in losartan-treated and placebo-treated patients reporting clinical adverse experiences. 72 Similarly, in patients with ISH, the tolerability of losartan was also found to be similar to placebo and superior to amlodipine or atenolol.…”
Section: Tolerability and Compliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Clinical trials have shown that administration of LOS alone lowers blood pressure, and is well tolerated in individuals with hypertension. [5][6][7][8] Furthermore, LOS was found to have beneficial effects on renal and cardiovascular outcomes independent of its antihypertensive function. 9,10 Thiazide diuretics such as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) have also been used for the treatment of hypertension and affect renal tubular mechanisms of electrolyte reabsorption, directly increasing the excretion of Na + and Cl 脌 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%