Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan

Abstract

Background Afghanistan’s health system is unique in that primary healthcare is delivered by non-governmental organizations funded by multilateral or bilateral donors, not the government. Given the wide range of implementers providing the basic package of health services, there may be performance differences in service delivery. This study assessed the relative technical efficiency of different levels of primary healthcare services and explored its determinants. Method Data envelopment analysis was used to assess the relative technical efficiency of three levels of primary healthcare facilities (comprehensive, basic, and sub-health centers). The inputs included personnel and capital expenditure, while the outputs were measured by the number of facility visits. Data on inputs and outputs were obtained from national health information databases for 1263 healthcare facilities in 31 provinces. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the correlation of various elements with efficiency scores. Regression models were used to identify potential factors associated with efficiency scores at the health facility level. Results The average efficiency score of health facilities was 0.74 when pooling all 1,263 health facilities, with 102 health facilities (8.1%) having efficiency scores of 1 (100% efficient). The lowest quintile of health facilities had an average efficiency score of 0.36, while the highest quintile had a score of 0.96. On average, efficiency scores of comprehensive health centers were higher than basic and sub-health centers by 0.11 and .07, respectively. In addition, the difference between efficiency scores of facilities in the highest and lowest quintiles was highest in facilities that offer fewer services. Thus, they have the largest room for improvement. Conclusions Our findings show that public health facilities in Afghanistan that provide more comprehensive primary health services use their resources more efficiently and that smaller facilities have more room for improvement. A more integrated delivery model would help improve the efficiency of providing primary healthcare in Afghanistan.

Evaluating China's primary healthcare services' efficiency and spatial correlation: a three-stage DEA-Malmquist model

“…Farhad et al employed the DEA approach and regression modeling to assess the efficiency of several basic healthcare facilities in Afghanistan. Their findings indicate that as the level of the institution increases, its efficiency also increases ( 29 ).…”

Infectious diseases in Afghanistan: Strategies for health system improvement

“…The Basic Health Services Program (BPHS) was created in 2003 to provide a package of essential basic health services. Community service services by group health workers in health posts, health subcenters (SHCs), grassroots health centers (BHCs), mobile health teams (MHTs), ambulatory care by general health centers (CHCs), and inpatient services by district hospitals (DHs) are the six types of standard health facilities in Afghanistan that provide BPHS 11 . The standard inputs in various healthcare institutions, such as employee levels and expertize, fluctuates, which have an impact on the efficiency of service delivery by affecting both inputs and outputs.…”

“…Community service services by group health workers in health posts, health subcenters (SHCs), grassroots health centers (BHCs), mobile health teams (MHTs), ambulatory care by general health centers (CHCs), and inpatient services by district hospitals (DHs) are the six types of standard health facilities in Afghanistan that provide BPHS. 11 The standard inputs in various healthcare institutions, such as employee levels and expertize, fluctuates, which have an impact on the efficiency of service delivery by affecting both inputs and outputs. However, despite the perception that primary healthcare in the nation is reliant on donors, a significant share of overall health expenditure is actually covered directly by families.…”