2019
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x19839359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and acceptability of an automated electronic system (DayCOR) compared with a telephone call system, for follow-up of day surgery patients

Abstract: Post-discharge phone calls are a widely used yet suboptimal method of ascertaining recovery of day surgery patients. We compared the efficiency of an automated electronic system of follow-up, the Day Care Anaesthesia Outcomes Recording Registry (DayCOR), and a telephone call system that was standard practice in our non-profit private healthcare organisation in Victoria, Australia. We also surveyed a group of clinicians to assess their acceptance of DayCOR compared with the telephone call system. DayCOR is a we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have described the effect of patients reporting their postoperative recovery after day surgery [11]. Web-based systems collecting alerts, managing and analysing patient-reported outcomes have been added to provide more valuable feedback [12]. The main limitation of these systems is the absence of remote data on physical parameters such as heart or respiratory rates, oxygen saturation and blood pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have described the effect of patients reporting their postoperative recovery after day surgery [11]. Web-based systems collecting alerts, managing and analysing patient-reported outcomes have been added to provide more valuable feedback [12]. The main limitation of these systems is the absence of remote data on physical parameters such as heart or respiratory rates, oxygen saturation and blood pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiency and acceptability of an electronic follow-up system (DayCOR) for paediatric patients Nicole LT Tan 1 , Kenneth W Sleeman 2 and John R Sestan 3 We note with interest the results of the survey by Smallbone et al, 1 and write to provide additional support for their proposal that electronic follow-up is more efficient than telephone follow-up for clinical purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a study comparing the usual telephone call system and an electronic system (DayCOR) at one of the participating hospitals, we demonstrated significant benefits of the latter. 3 These included increased efficiency (a higher patient response rate, more complete data collection and lower cost) and increased acceptability to anaesthetists and day surgery nurses. We did not survey parents or carers, and therefore welcome Smallbone et al.’s finding of positive parental/carer attitudes towards using electronic devices and SMS messaging to follow up children after hospital discharge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank Tan and Sestan for their interest in our work 1 and for their interesting additional analysis from their previously published report into the DayCOR system. 2 We are pleased to hear of the high response rate received from parents of paediatric patients when using SMS to distribute an online survey.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
We thank Tan and Sestan for their interest in our work 1 and for their interesting additional analysis from their previously published report into the DayCOR system. 2 We are pleased to hear of the high response rate received from parents of paediatric patients when using SMS to distribute an online survey.The use of online surveys is one method for electronic follow-up that we have considered, although we are also interested to see whether direct conversational SMS messaging provides a lower barrier to engagement-particularly for collecting longitudinal data at regular intervals during patient recovery.We are currently planning to trial such a system at our institution and look forward to showing these results in due course (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; identifier ACTRN1261 9001028190). Further work to directly compare various electronic follow-up methods would also be a useful addition to this area of enquiry.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%