2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and power upgrade by an additional high pressure economizer installation at an aged 620 MWe lignite-fired power plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been confirmed by many commercial power units in China that the application of an exhaust heat recovery process can result in multiple advantages for the power plant, such as coal savings, water savings, and dust emission removal. [20][21][22] Of this, the low-temperature economizer (LTE) process [23][24][25][26] is currently applied on a practical level. However, it is noted by several literatures [27][28][29] that the conventional bypass flue (CBF), which was originally implemented in a 1000-MW brown coal-fired unit at the Niederaussem power plant in Germany in the 1990s, 30 has an obvious superiority than the LTE, whether in thermal economy or in techno-economic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been confirmed by many commercial power units in China that the application of an exhaust heat recovery process can result in multiple advantages for the power plant, such as coal savings, water savings, and dust emission removal. [20][21][22] Of this, the low-temperature economizer (LTE) process [23][24][25][26] is currently applied on a practical level. However, it is noted by several literatures [27][28][29] that the conventional bypass flue (CBF), which was originally implemented in a 1000-MW brown coal-fired unit at the Niederaussem power plant in Germany in the 1990s, 30 has an obvious superiority than the LTE, whether in thermal economy or in techno-economic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, E u , E h , and E r are the unit efficiency, heat efficiency, and waste heat recovery efficiency of the unit, respectively, Q FAH is the heat obtained by air in FAH (kJ), Q LPE is the heat obtained by water in LPE (kJ), Q HPE is the heat obtained by water in HPE (kJ), Q g is the heat supplied by the flue gas from the hot air stove (kJ), W wp , W op , and W f are the work done by water pumps, oil pump and fans per unit time, respectively, in kJ. In Equations (12)- (15), Q FAH , Q AP , Q LPE , Q HPE , and Q g can be calculated by Equation (16), W wp , W op , and W f can be calculated by Equation 17:…”
Section: Unit Efficiency and Heat Efficiency Of The Experiments Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang [14] used an equivalent heat drop method to analyze the waste heat use effect of fluorinated plastic LTEs. A high pressure economizer (HPE) set behind the AP was used to heat the boiler feed water [15]. In recent years, many flue gas waste heat deep use technologies have been conceived and applied on some large-scale coal-fired units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the partial water flow design presented by Stevenovic et al . , all of the feed water is passed through the economizer except that supplied to the attemperators (≈3% of total load, maximum).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%