2012
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and purity provided by the existing methods for the isolation of luteinized granulosa cells: a comparative study

Abstract: There is currently no gold standard method for the isolation of LGCs, and protocols should be chosen depending on the purpose in question. We conclude that fluorescence-activated cell sorting is the best protocol for isolating LGCs when purity is the principal criterion, and magnetic separation when both purity and viability are essential. However, cell straining (filter) is probably the least laborious and, overall, the most efficient method to isolate LGCs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method we used for the isolation of the GCs has been used in previous studies by us and by other authors (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method we used for the isolation of the GCs has been used in previous studies by us and by other authors (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the cell strainer methodology (31, 32) but with some modifications (33), the aspirates were first filtered through a 40 mm pore size cell strainer (BD Biosciences) to retain the clusters of GCs. The strainer was then rinsed with 12 mL PBS to remove the last traces of blood contaminants, and the strainer was back washed with PBS to collect the GCs.…”
Section: Collection Of Ff and Gcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCs were individually purified from FF samples with similar methods as previously described [10, 34]. Briefly, FF sample of each person was centrifuged and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%