2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency determination of tubular solar receivers in central receiver systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T rec , Q air and T x are determined using either Model 1 or 2, together with an ε NTU method for the air inside tubes. Values of T x predicted by both models are plotted against experimental data [8] in Figure 3, where it can be observed that model 2 provides a more accurate description while model 1 tends to overestimate T x .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…T rec , Q air and T x are determined using either Model 1 or 2, together with an ε NTU method for the air inside tubes. Values of T x predicted by both models are plotted against experimental data [8] in Figure 3, where it can be observed that model 2 provides a more accurate description while model 1 tends to overestimate T x .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where is the heat gained by the air in the receiver, the fraction of the incident radiation that reaches the receiver, G the direct normal irradiance, the aperture area of the collector, the absorber area of the receivers, ɛ the effective emissivity, σ the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, the ambient temperature (K), the temperature of the surface of the receiver and the convective losses of the solar receiver. was estimated using experimental data [8] shown in Table 1. The effective emissivity of the receiver ɛ was calculated by considering an emissivity value of 0.9 [9] for the tubes in a cylindrical cavity and affecting it by the view factor between the tubes and cavity apertures, as proposed in [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent compilation and comparison among those models is due to Jafrancesco et al [13]. Solar receivers technology, specially at the high temperatures required by Brayton cycles, is an open research field, both from the experimental viewpoint [14,15] or from computational fluid dynamics or materials perspectives [16]. There are also different tools to predict the performance of the power units producing the electricity from the thermosolar input as TRNSYS [17], Thermoflex [18], EBSILON Professional [19], EES [20], etc., that have been used by many authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, validation of these methods is required through either direct or indirect systems regularly. In 2016 Ebert et al [11] presented a new measurement-supported simulation approach for the estimation of the solar input power. The uncertainty of the solar input was estimated to be from -1.3% to +6.3% which contributed to the overall uncertainty in the SOLUGAS receiver to be between -2.8% and +7.7%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%