2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency evaluation for triple-junction solar cells in five tandem configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the other three, η av exhibits a local maximum at around E g,top = 1.7 eV reflecting the E g -dependent photovoltaic performance of the single cells, and then increases with E g,top from 1.8 to 2.4 eV. 74 However, the practical upper limit of E g,top is 2.3 eV (CsPbBr 3 ) at present, 44 because previous studies reported a rapid lowering in η at a wider E g . 3,9 In addition, the difference between the two calculated η av values at E g,top = 2.3 and 2.4 eV is marginal.…”
Section: Optimization Of 3j Solar Modulesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the other three, η av exhibits a local maximum at around E g,top = 1.7 eV reflecting the E g -dependent photovoltaic performance of the single cells, and then increases with E g,top from 1.8 to 2.4 eV. 74 However, the practical upper limit of E g,top is 2.3 eV (CsPbBr 3 ) at present, 44 because previous studies reported a rapid lowering in η at a wider E g . 3,9 In addition, the difference between the two calculated η av values at E g,top = 2.3 and 2.4 eV is marginal.…”
Section: Optimization Of 3j Solar Modulesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…durability because they are composed of top cells with E g,top = 2.0-2.1 eV, 74 contrasting to that 2J-2T cells and modules using c-Si and CIGS bottom cells are free from this problem as described in Section 4.2. By contrast, the other three configurations using E g,top = 2.3 eV and E g,mid = 1.55-1.66 eV provide potentially high durability, [71][72][73] along with high tolerance to large variations in the optimization and operation conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, similar V oc values have also been obtained in the simulations and experiments of other kinds of triple‐junction tandem solar cells. McMeekin et al established a FA 0.83 Cs 0.17 Pb(Br 0.7 I 0.3 ) 3 top‐cell (1.94 eV)/MAPbI 3 mid‐cell (1.57 eV)/FA 0.6 MA 0.4 Pb 0.4 Sn 0.6 I 3 bot‐cell (1.34 eV) triple‐junction tandem solar cell and obtained a V oc of 3.30 V. [ 62 ] Zhang et al designed a FAPbIBr 2 top‐cell (1.96 eV)/MAPbI 3 mid‐cell (1.55 eV)/p‐Si bot‐cell (1.12 eV) triple‐junction tandem solar cell and obtained a V oc of 3.42 V. [ 61 ] Besides, in the experimental preparation of high‐cost and high‐efficiency GaAs‐based solar cells, Geisz et al fabricated a Ga 0.51 In 0.49 P top‐cell (1.83 eV)/In 0.04 Ga 0.96 As middle‐cell (1.34 eV)/In 37 Ga 63 As bottom‐cell (0.89 eV) triple‐junction tandem solar cell and achieved a V oc of 3.28 V. [ 65 ] These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our methodology in constructing antimony chalcogenides‐based triple‐junction tandem solar cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, using the similar simulation method, the theoretical PCEs of 30.4% and 31.79% were reported for triplejunction tandem solar cells based on different bandgap perovskite materials. [61,62] It can be predicted that through continuous optimization, the PCEs of antimony chalcogenides and perovskite-based triple-junction tandem solar cells are expected to exceed 30%. In the pursuit of high-performance solar cells, theoretical modeling and simulation can help understand the mechanism of solar cell devices and find out the key factors affecting the device performance.…”
Section: Triple-junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes are primarily impacted by the bandgap of the semiconductor, which exhibits a decreasing trend as temperature increases. This relationship between temperature and semiconductor parameters can be accurately described using the Varshni relationship, as indicated in equation (10) [58,59].…”
Section: The Impact Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%