2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency evaluation of banks in China: A dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
84
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Vlontzos et al (2014) applied DEA approach to evaluate the energy and environmental efficiency of the primary sectors of the EU member state countries, the results show that the countries with strong environmental protection standards appear to be less energy and environmentally efficient. Zha et al (2015) used the improved DEA model to evaluate the operational efficiency of banks in China during [2008][2009][2010][2011][2012], and found that the banks in China showed both technical and scale inefficiency. Deng et al (2016) used the slack based measure-data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model to estimate the water use efficiency of 31 provinces in China during [2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013].…”
Section: Dea Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vlontzos et al (2014) applied DEA approach to evaluate the energy and environmental efficiency of the primary sectors of the EU member state countries, the results show that the countries with strong environmental protection standards appear to be less energy and environmentally efficient. Zha et al (2015) used the improved DEA model to evaluate the operational efficiency of banks in China during [2008][2009][2010][2011][2012], and found that the banks in China showed both technical and scale inefficiency. Deng et al (2016) used the slack based measure-data envelopment analysis (SBM-DEA) model to estimate the water use efficiency of 31 provinces in China during [2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013].…”
Section: Dea Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also would like to point out that other DEA methodologies have been used to assess the efficiency of banks; for example, Network DEA (e.g., Matthews 2013; Grigoroudis et al 2013;Akther et al 2013;Fukuyama and Matousek 2017;Gulati and Kumar 2017), Network DEA with undesirable variables (e.g., An et al 2015;Liu et al 2015), Dynamic DEA (e.g., Avkiran and Goto 2011;Fukuyama andWeber 2015, 2017), Dynamic Network DEA (e.g., Avkiran 2015;Chao et al 2015;Fukuyama andWeber 2015, 2017;Zha et al 2016;Wu et al 2016;Fukuyama and Weber 2017b), Fuzzy DEA (e.g., Wang et al 2014;Wanke et al 2016;Hatami-Marbini et al 2017), DEA with Bootstrapping (e.g., Ferrier and Hirschberg 1997), Fuzzy DEA with Bootstrapping (e.g., Wanke et al 2016), and Stochastic DEA (e.g., Kao and Liu 2009). For a recent survey, we refer the reader to Kaffash and Marra (2017).…”
Section: Landscape Of Research On Efficiency Assessment In Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While radial models assume that input reductions and output expansions change proportionally (Seiford & Zhu, 1999;Lewis & Sexton, 2004;Castelli, Pesenti, & Ukovich, 2010;Yang & Liu, 2012;Kao, Wu, & Huang, 2017;Marchetti & Wanke, 2017), non-radial models are a more flexible evaluation tool that can compute input contractions and output improvements individually (Yu & Lin, 2008;Barros, Managi, & Matousek, 2012;Xu & Cui, 2017). Furthermore, given that slacks have been recognized as important factors in explaining inefficient behavior (Mahlberg & Sahoo, 2011), a network slacks-based measure (NSBM) model proposed by Tone and Tsutsui (2009) has been widely used for performance evaluation in various industries (Avkiran, 2009;Yu, 2010;Galagedera, Watson, Premachandra, & Chen, 2016;Zha, Liang, Wu, & Bian, 2016;Xu & Cui, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%