2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2007.00410.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency in International Trade with Firm Heterogeneity and Networks

Abstract: This paper examines integrated effects of firm heterogeneity and communication network services on international trade. Patterns and effects of trade are analyzed in a general equilibrium model where firms with different productivity levels share among them the cost of network services and compete in a monopolistically competitive market for a differentiated good. The paper reveals that the more efficient country in the production of the differentiated good is not always the net exporter of the good. The less … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By doing so, they are able to replicate stylized facts such as the procyclicality of firm entry and profits and the countercyclicality of mark-ups. The framework of heterogenous firms, monopolistic competition and firm creation has been used to study international trade (Hiep and Ohta, 2007;Baldwin and Forslid, 2010). In addition, a sticky-price version has been developed in papers by Bergin and Corsetti (2008), Bilbiie et al (2008), and Lewis (2009) to conduct business cycle and monetary policy analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, they are able to replicate stylized facts such as the procyclicality of firm entry and profits and the countercyclicality of mark-ups. The framework of heterogenous firms, monopolistic competition and firm creation has been used to study international trade (Hiep and Ohta, 2007;Baldwin and Forslid, 2010). In addition, a sticky-price version has been developed in papers by Bergin and Corsetti (2008), Bilbiie et al (2008), and Lewis (2009) to conduct business cycle and monetary policy analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaney (2008) and Do and Levchenko (2009), e.g., replace Melitz's modelling of a dynamic market-entry game with an infinite mass of entrants by assuming a fixed number of firms that are either active or inactive. Their simpli-1 The Melitz model has been successfully extended by introducing specific institutions (Hiep and Hiroshi, 2007) or special characteristics of product markets (Melitz and Ottaviano, 2008;Arkolakis, 2011) or labor markets (Helpman and Itshoki, 2010;Egger and Kreickemeier, 2009). All of these extensions, however, typically postulate a specific distribution of firm productivities in order to reconcile the implications of their models with observed productivity distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Melitz model has been successfully extended by introducing specific institutions (Hiep and Hiroshi, ) or special characteristics of product markets (Melitz and Ottaviano, ; Arkolakis, ) or labor markets (Helpman and Itskhoki, ; Egger and Kreickemeier, ). All of these extensions, however, typically postulate a specific distribution of firm productivities in order to reconcile the implications of their models with observed productivity distributions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%