1975
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(75)90004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of aerosol filters made of ultrafine polydisperse fibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigation with silver nanoparticles in charge equilibrium with sizes from 3 to 20 nm in diameter (Kim et al 2007) show however no indication of the thermal rebound for the filter used, yet measurements down to 3 nm were only possible for one filter due to counting efficiency issues. Studies of nanoparticle filtration with electrospun polymer fibers with a narrow size distribution in the particle size range above 10 nm in diameter (Yun et al 2007) did not indicate any substantial differences for charged and uncharged particles and show a good agreement with the classical filtration theory (Kirsh et al 1975). However, the same authors reported much higher experimentally measured penetration of nanoparticles when compared to the classical theory in the case of a glass HEPA filter with a broad fiber diameter distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Investigation with silver nanoparticles in charge equilibrium with sizes from 3 to 20 nm in diameter (Kim et al 2007) show however no indication of the thermal rebound for the filter used, yet measurements down to 3 nm were only possible for one filter due to counting efficiency issues. Studies of nanoparticle filtration with electrospun polymer fibers with a narrow size distribution in the particle size range above 10 nm in diameter (Yun et al 2007) did not indicate any substantial differences for charged and uncharged particles and show a good agreement with the classical filtration theory (Kirsh et al 1975). However, the same authors reported much higher experimentally measured penetration of nanoparticles when compared to the classical theory in the case of a glass HEPA filter with a broad fiber diameter distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As seen in this figure, the experimental pressure drops are in fairly good agreement except the mixing fraction of 5% and 20%. The discrepancy between the predicted and the experimental data represent the degree of inhomogeneity of fibers, which was introduced by Kirsch et al (1975) for accounting the inhomogeneous packing of fibers and the orientation of fibers in filter media in predicting the collection efficiency of a filter. For mixed fiber filters we introduced the inhomogeneity factor which is the ratio of theoretical pressure drop predicted by Eqs.…”
Section: Prediction Of Filtration Performance Of Mixed Fiber Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matulevicius et al (2014) experimentally measured the collection performance of nanofiber filter media fabricated by electrospinning of polyamide, and reported that the filter with finer fibers had a high collection efficiency and a high quality factor. Sambaer et al (2014) and Podgorski et al (2011) introduced the inhomogeneity factor in the prediction of collection efficiency of a laminated nanofiber filter, which was originally proposed by Kirsch et al (1975), and reported that the predicted collection efficiency agreed well with the experimental data by the correction with the inhomogeneity factor. They also reported that the inhomogeneity factor of nanofiber filter was high compared to HEPA filters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The particle penetration, P is converted to the single fiber efficiency, Z, given by eq 4 (Kirsh et al, 1975). Figure 8 shows the experimental single fiber efficiency of an ethanol soaked electrospun filter and that of a micrometer-sized filter, plotted as a function of Peclet number:…”
Section: Filtration Performancementioning
confidence: 99%