2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijmor.2017.080746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of commercial banks in Turkey and their comparison: application of DEA with Tobit analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We built an econometric model to investigate the abovementioned factors. Note that the period efficiency and stage efficiency of the banking sector may be greater than 1, so the Tobit panel model [58] or truncated regression model [59] is unsuitable for this study. The choice between fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) can be determined by the Hausman test [60].…”
Section: Determinants Of Bank Efficiency and Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We built an econometric model to investigate the abovementioned factors. Note that the period efficiency and stage efficiency of the banking sector may be greater than 1, so the Tobit panel model [58] or truncated regression model [59] is unsuitable for this study. The choice between fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) can be determined by the Hausman test [60].…”
Section: Determinants Of Bank Efficiency and Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para Kutlar et al (2017), que avaliaram os bancos comerciais da Turquia para o período de 2003 a 2012 por meio da metodologia DEA (CCR e BCC), os resultados observados foram mistos. Na análise de eficiência tanto do modelo CCR quanto do BCC, houve, ao longo do período examinado, uma redução do número de bancos tecnicamente eficientes, no entanto a eficiência alocativa dos bancos turcos aumentou nesse período.…”
Section: Literatura De Eficiência Bancáriaunclassified
“…Cook and Kress [2] showed some models like WSR that apply an imposed set of weights may fail to obtain a correct evaluation. Cook and Kress [2] applied a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based methodology of Charnes et al [3] for measuring the preference scores without imposing any fixed weights from the outset (see [4,5,6]. Their proposed method obtained the most favorable weights for each alternative but their method very often leads to more than one alternative as efficient.…”
Section: Izadikhah and E Karapinarmentioning
confidence: 99%