Proceedings of the VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS Congress 2016) 2016
DOI: 10.7712/100016.1810.12018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of Damage-Plasticity Models in Capturing Compaction-Expansion Transition of Concrete Under Different Compression Loading Conditions

Abstract: Abstract. The pre-and post-peak performance features of two widely used damage-plasticity constitutive formulations are assessed for modeling the multiaxial response behavior of pressure sensitive quasi-brittle materials such as concrete. Two benchmark problems have been solved using commercial software packages; ABAQUS which implements the two invariant LeeFenves damaged plasticity formulation as its main feature for concrete has been used along with LS-DYNA which is using Duvaut-Lion damage and plasticity mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the concrete is a granular material, it is susceptible to volumetric strain generated during plastic deformation when it is subjected to shear deformations [12]. The potential plastic flow of concrete material in CDP used two input parameters, (ψ), and (є) as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Concrete Damage Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the concrete is a granular material, it is susceptible to volumetric strain generated during plastic deformation when it is subjected to shear deformations [12]. The potential plastic flow of concrete material in CDP used two input parameters, (ψ), and (є) as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Concrete Damage Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concrete models in LS-DYNA (Hallquist 2006) include Karagozian and Case model (concrete damage model, MAT-72) ( Brannon and Leelavanichkul 2009;Malvar et al 1997), the Riedel-Hiermaier-Thoma model (MAT-272) (Borrvall and Riedel 2011;Hansson and Skoglund 2002), the BrannonFossum model (Fossum et al 2004), and the continuous surface cap model (CSCM, MAT-159) (Murray 2007). Among these, CSCM has many applications in the literature (Bermejo et al 2011;Champiri et al 2015aChampiri et al , b, 2016Farage et al 2004;Mousavi et al 2016) as it uses only two parameters: uniaxial compressive strength and maximum size of aggregate in the simplest version while other material models need many input parameters. CSCM uses the Duvaut-Lions formulation (Simo et al 1988) and it is a cap model with a smooth or continuous intersection between the failure surface and the hardening cap.…”
Section: Continuous Cap Surface Model For Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two tests were performed for each of the fine and coarse aggregates to obtain the results shown in Table 3-8. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] shows different tests performed on the fresh concrete. The results of these tests for the four mixes are shown in Table 3-9.…”
Section: Design Of Concrete Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%