2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance in differentiation between benign and malignant endometrial lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with the results of Elsammak et al [3], who found a significant difference between the mean ADC values of malignant masses (0.82 ×10 3 mm 2 /s) and benign lesions (1.44 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s), and those of Kececi et al [12], who revealed that the mean ADC value of 42 malignant lesions (0.94 ± 0.18 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) was statistically significantly lower than the mean ADC value of benign lesions (1.45 ± 0.22 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) (P < 0.01), and matched also with Fujii et al [17], who concluded that malignant tumors namely endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma show lower ADC values than benign tumors. Also, Thulaseedharan et al [18] and Heo et al's [19] studies showed that there was a much lower ADC value for malignant endometrial lesions compared to the benign endometrial lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results are consistent with the results of Elsammak et al [3], who found a significant difference between the mean ADC values of malignant masses (0.82 ×10 3 mm 2 /s) and benign lesions (1.44 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s), and those of Kececi et al [12], who revealed that the mean ADC value of 42 malignant lesions (0.94 ± 0.18 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) was statistically significantly lower than the mean ADC value of benign lesions (1.45 ± 0.22 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s) (P < 0.01), and matched also with Fujii et al [17], who concluded that malignant tumors namely endometrial carcinoma and carcinosarcoma show lower ADC values than benign tumors. Also, Thulaseedharan et al [18] and Heo et al's [19] studies showed that there was a much lower ADC value for malignant endometrial lesions compared to the benign endometrial lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our results were in harmony with Elsammak et al's [3] results which concealed that conventional MRI could correctly diagnose 36/42 cases, achieving 77.8% sensitivity, 99.17% specificity, 87.5 PPV, and 84.6% NPV, and matched also with Bharwani et al [23] who stated that the addition of DWI to conventional MRI has increased the sensitivity and specificity to 86% and 100%, respectively, in the diagnosis of uterine endometrial lesions; Takeuchi et al [24,26] reported a sensitivity and specificity of DWI in endometrial lesions which were 100% and 81%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…on T2WI, 26 cases (40 %) were hypointense, 5 cases (8%) were hyper intense, 23 cases (35%) were heterogenous and 11 cases (17 %) were isointense. This is in accordance with the study of Ahmed Elsammaketal in 2008 [5] which showed lesions with hypointense signals at T1WI, heterogeneous signals at T2WI were probably malignant, while those that displayed hypointense signals on T1W images, hyperintense signals on T2W images were probably benign.…”
Section: Agedistributionsupporting
confidence: 92%