2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to detect soil erosion vulnerability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of them considered various factors affecting soil productivity using standard and adjusted Mediterranean desertification and land use (MEDALUS) approaches [34,35], and/or FAO/UNEP and UNESCO provisional methodology [36]. However, these methods use equal weights for all parameters when mapping LDV, while each criterion has a point value and depends on physical, geomorphological, and environmental impact regarding land degradation [37]. Therefore, the current work is a trial for using AHP to prioritize variables and indices affecting soil performance in Farafra Oasis to be integrated under the GIS environment for allocating LDV zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them considered various factors affecting soil productivity using standard and adjusted Mediterranean desertification and land use (MEDALUS) approaches [34,35], and/or FAO/UNEP and UNESCO provisional methodology [36]. However, these methods use equal weights for all parameters when mapping LDV, while each criterion has a point value and depends on physical, geomorphological, and environmental impact regarding land degradation [37]. Therefore, the current work is a trial for using AHP to prioritize variables and indices affecting soil performance in Farafra Oasis to be integrated under the GIS environment for allocating LDV zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess erosion vulnerability, a combination of GIS technologies and the multi-criteria decision method (MCDM) can be employed efficiently. In several previous case studies, it was confirmed that the combination of GIS tools and MCDM method in watershed and soil resource analysis, evaluation and vulnerability improves the decision-making process (Jaiswal et al 2015;Haidara et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, most of those 50 studies merely focus on analyzing single landscape factors. Prominently, they are a study on soil erosion following the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) of Wiscehmeir and Smith [2]; a study on soil erosion through the sensitivity of natural environments [3][4][5][6][7][8]; a study on landscape assessment according to quantitative methods with the calculation of erosion indexes following terrain and rainfall [9,10]; a study on the landscape sensitivity in line with space and time based on landscape equilibrium indexes [11,12]; soil erosion indexes were established based on the calculations of potential, practical soil loss indexes, and soil erosion susceptibility (soil erosion and conservation, models of soil erosion and land use, spatial patterns of soil erosion susceptibility) [13][14][15]; approaching landscape analysis in accordance with the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [16][17][18]; constructing a model calculating erosion rates in terms of landscapes [19][20][21][22][23]; and a study on the geomorphic limitations on landscape sensitivity owing to the climate of tectonically active sites [24][25][26]. It can be seen that the erosion indexes of those studies are derived from only soil erosion or from studying separately on factors that are influential in erosion including terrain, geomorphology, rainfall, and vegetation cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%