2016
DOI: 10.17323/2411-7390-2016-2-4-63-74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of Individualised Resources in the Russian EFL Classroom

Abstract: In order to plan lessons that include effective instructional strategies, it is critical for teachers to be aware of student aptitudes, personality variables, learning strategies, interests, aspirations, and talents. This paper presents a way for Russian teachers to improve their students' speaking abilities when learning foreign languages, called individualised resources, which are based on the concept of individualisation. Individualised resources are designed to help students to actively participate in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transferring knowledge from a group to an individual task poses certain added difficulties-identifying and remembering what was learned within the formal structure in which it was learned (Cheng, 2016;Stognieva, 2016). In other words, working in small groups in which everyone collaborates and ideas are collected under a group identity, but with a great deal of internal diversity, is not the same as working individually (Rahimi & Tavakoli, 2016;Rodríguez & Roehr-Brackin, 2015).…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transferring knowledge from a group to an individual task poses certain added difficulties-identifying and remembering what was learned within the formal structure in which it was learned (Cheng, 2016;Stognieva, 2016). In other words, working in small groups in which everyone collaborates and ideas are collected under a group identity, but with a great deal of internal diversity, is not the same as working individually (Rahimi & Tavakoli, 2016;Rodríguez & Roehr-Brackin, 2015).…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%