2020
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-17489
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency Of Integrated Seismic Methods Approach To Near-Surface Characterization

Abstract: <p>Surface seismic methods are among the most popular, widely accepted, geophysical methods for near-surface characterization. The most practical and effective way to perform in-situ measurements and data processing using different seismic methods as are seismic refraction, seismic reflection and MASW method in an integrated approach is presented in this paper. Each method has some advantages and limitations, but their application in an integrated approach provides higher accuracy in subsurface m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most practical, cost and time effective way to perform in-situ measurement and processing by using different active and passive seismic methods as are seismic refraction, seismic reflection, MASW and HVSR method is presented in this paper through the results from the surveys performed at 2 characteristic locations. Each of these methods has some advantages and limitations, but their application in an integrated approach enables the results to be compared and complement each other, reducing thus the likelihood of making errors in interpretation and providing a higher accuracy subsurface modelling [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most practical, cost and time effective way to perform in-situ measurement and processing by using different active and passive seismic methods as are seismic refraction, seismic reflection, MASW and HVSR method is presented in this paper through the results from the surveys performed at 2 characteristic locations. Each of these methods has some advantages and limitations, but their application in an integrated approach enables the results to be compared and complement each other, reducing thus the likelihood of making errors in interpretation and providing a higher accuracy subsurface modelling [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each selected location, time and cost-effective surveys were conducted by joint acquisition of seismic refraction, seismic reflection and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) data. Microtremor measurements for HVSR (Horizontal to Vertical Spectral Ratio) analysis were also performed for definition of the predominant frequency and joint inversion of the dispersion and HVSR curve [3,4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%