2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of protein synthesis inhibition depends on tRNA and codon compositions

Abstract: Regulation and maintenance of protein synthesis are vital to all organisms and are thus key targets of attack and defense at the cellular level. Here, we mathematically analyze protein synthesis for its sensitivity to the inhibition of elongation factor EF-Tu and/or ribosomes in dependence of the system’s tRNA and codon compositions. We find that protein synthesis reacts ultrasensitively to a decrease in the elongation factor’s concentration for systems with an imbalance between codon usages and tRNA concentra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The competition between the aa-tRNAs results in variations in decoding times for different codon-aa-tRNA pairs ( Rudorf et al, 2014 ; Vieira et al, 2016 ; Dykeman, 2020 ), even though the rates of reactions on the decoding pathway, such as binding, GTP hydrolysis, and tRNA accommodation, are similar for different cognate aa-tRNAs ( Rodnina et al, 2005 ; Ledoux and Uhlenbeck, 2008 ). Although in bacteria, global codon usage matches the tRNA abundance, transient changes in the transcriptome composition due to transcriptional responses may shift mRNA codon bias relative to tRNA concentrations, which is predicted to have strong effects on decoding and may lead to additional, unexpected ribosome pauses ( Rudorf, 2019 ; Dykeman, 2020 ). Under conditions of rapid growth, tRNAs are almost fully charged ( Dittmar et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Non-uniform Rate Of Translation and Translational Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competition between the aa-tRNAs results in variations in decoding times for different codon-aa-tRNA pairs ( Rudorf et al, 2014 ; Vieira et al, 2016 ; Dykeman, 2020 ), even though the rates of reactions on the decoding pathway, such as binding, GTP hydrolysis, and tRNA accommodation, are similar for different cognate aa-tRNAs ( Rodnina et al, 2005 ; Ledoux and Uhlenbeck, 2008 ). Although in bacteria, global codon usage matches the tRNA abundance, transient changes in the transcriptome composition due to transcriptional responses may shift mRNA codon bias relative to tRNA concentrations, which is predicted to have strong effects on decoding and may lead to additional, unexpected ribosome pauses ( Rudorf, 2019 ; Dykeman, 2020 ). Under conditions of rapid growth, tRNAs are almost fully charged ( Dittmar et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Non-uniform Rate Of Translation and Translational Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the factors which seems to have a strong influence on the translational dynamics was the composition of the transcriptome, both in its codon bias relative to tRNA concentrations and its length and total nucleotide content. The ultra sensitivity of the translational process on the tRNA abundance relative to codon bias has also been noted by Rudorf et al when Ef-Tu and TC formation reactions have been accounted for in their translational models [28,30]. However, preliminary work on reproducing the observed translational dynamics with wild-type E. Coli transcriptomes using mRNAs from predicted ORFs showed that, while matching of the tRNA abundances to codon bias enhanced translational efficiency to values closer to what is expected experimentally, additional optimization of the parameters or the overall model is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007618.g004 [28,30] which have also taken into account the effects of competition amongst newly charged tRNAs for Ef-Tu:GTP and the effects of codon bias on the overall translational process. Ribosomal density on mRNAs is transcriptome dependent.…”
Section: Biological Predictions Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the ribosome elongation step in the model encompasses 9 individual kinetic steps covering concentration dependant recruitment of ternary complex, GTP hydrolysis, and EF-G dependant translocation of the ribosome. Such reaction steps have been also been accounted for in similar models of translation [ 16 ], including the dependence on tRNA concentrations [ 17 ]. Similar kinetic detail is also present in the model for the initiation and recycling/termination stages, while the additional reactions involving re-charging of ternary complex and GTP/GDP exchange on GTPases are also accounted for.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%