2020
DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2020001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of Surber net under different substrate and flow conditions: insights for macroinvertebrates sampling and river biomonitoring

Abstract: In biomonitoring great attention has been paid on the selection of the best indices and metrics, often neglecting a simple but fundamental aspect: how reliable are the sampling methodologies? We tested the efficiency of the Surber net in collecting stream macroinvertebrates by comparing two samples collected consecutively on the same plot. We found that substrate particle size and water depth and velocity significantly affected sampling efficiency, especially regarding the total taxa richness, EPT (Ephemeropte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…substrate type) occurrence. A Surber net (0.05 m 2 , 250 lm mesh-size) was placed flush with the river bottom, and benthic macroinvertebrates were collected by perturbing and washing the surface of substrate elements inside the metal frame of the net (Doretto et al 2020a). Benthic invertebrates were preserved in the field in 90% ethanol labelled jars, transported to the laboratory where samples were sorted and all individuals were counted and systematically identified to family level under a microscope (NIKON SMZ 1500 light microscope; 60-100 X), following the taxonomic keys for the Italian macroinvertebrate fauna (Campaioli et al 1994(Campaioli et al , 1999.…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…substrate type) occurrence. A Surber net (0.05 m 2 , 250 lm mesh-size) was placed flush with the river bottom, and benthic macroinvertebrates were collected by perturbing and washing the surface of substrate elements inside the metal frame of the net (Doretto et al 2020a). Benthic invertebrates were preserved in the field in 90% ethanol labelled jars, transported to the laboratory where samples were sorted and all individuals were counted and systematically identified to family level under a microscope (NIKON SMZ 1500 light microscope; 60-100 X), following the taxonomic keys for the Italian macroinvertebrate fauna (Campaioli et al 1994(Campaioli et al , 1999.…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datry et al, 2017;Samways et al, 2020) and considering that the overall pool of species in Alpine streams is expected to be mainly composed by taxa not adapted to drying (e.g. Doretto et al, 2018Doretto et al, , 2020aPiano et al, 2019a), we made the following hypotheses: (i) taxonomic diversity should decrease in intermittent sites at both reach and basin; (ii) variation in taxa composition among permanent and intermittent reaches is best explained by taxa loss (i.e., nestedness) than by taxa replacement (i.e. turnover); and (iii) loss of taxa displaying particular trait combinations should directly lead to a reduction of functional diversity and a general rearrangement of the total functional space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datry, Bonada, & Boulton, 2017; Samways et al., 2020) and considering that the overall pool of species in Alpine streams is expected to be mainly composed by taxa not adapted to drying (e.g. Doretto, Bo, Bona, & Fenoglio, 2020; Doretto et al., 2018; Piano, Doretto, Falasco, Fenoglio, et al, 2019), we made the following hypotheses: (1) taxonomic diversity should decrease in intermittent sites at both reach and basin scale; (2) variation in taxa composition among permanent and intermittent reaches is better explained by taxa loss (i.e. nestedness) in intermittent reaches than by taxa replacement (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each patch, which consisted of a surface of 0.062 m 2 , i.e., the area of the Surber sampler, we measured flow velocity (0.05 m from the bottom) and water depth with a current meter (Hydro-bios Kiel) and we visually estimated percentages of different substratum sizes measured with a gravelometer following the classification of Wentworth, namely boulders ([ 256 mm), cobbles (64-256 mm), gravel (2-64 mm) and fine sediment (\ 2 mm). One sample was collected in each sampling patch, by using a Surber sampler (250 lm mesh size; 0.062 m 2 area) and we collected both the retained CPOM and macroinvertebrates (Doretto et al, 2020b). Collected samples were preserved in plastic jars with 75% ethanol.…”
Section: Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%