2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1571-0661(04)00313-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Algorithms for the Maximum Subarray Problem by Distance Matrix Multiplication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tamaki and Tokuyama present an Oðn 3 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi log log n=log n p Þ time, which is subcubic, for the two dimensional maximum subarray problem based on divideand-conquer approach [4] utilizing Takaoka's DMM algorithm [3]. The simplified solution with the same complexity is given in [5]. We modify this algorithm to compute the K-maximum subarray problem for two dimensions.…”
Section: Divide-and-conquermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Tamaki and Tokuyama present an Oðn 3 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi log log n=log n p Þ time, which is subcubic, for the two dimensional maximum subarray problem based on divideand-conquer approach [4] utilizing Takaoka's DMM algorithm [3]. The simplified solution with the same complexity is given in [5]. We modify this algorithm to compute the K-maximum subarray problem for two dimensions.…”
Section: Divide-and-conquermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subcubic time algorithm for the maximum subarray problem We review the divide-and-conquer approach given in [5]. Let a two-dimensional array a[1..m, 1..n] of real numbers be given as input data.…”
Section: Generalization Of Dmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A simple extension of this solution can solve the two-dimensional problem in O(m 2 n) time for an m × n array (m ≤ n), which is cubic when m = n [4,5]. In this paper, if only n appears in complexities for the two-dimensional case, we assume m = n. The sub-cubic time solution based on Takaoka's sub-cubic distance matrix multiplication algorithm [14] is given by Tamaki and Tokuyama [17], which is further simplified by Takaoka [15]. In the context of parallel computations, time and cost optimal PRAM and mesh algorithms for the one-dimensional case are described in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%