“…Table 3 describes the sequence information, including different resolutions, numbers of frames, and frame rates (FPS). We use (11) to compute time-saving and evaluate the coding efficiency by BDBR and BDPSNR [26,27] Table 4, the proposed algorithm saves 43.85% of the average coding time, which is better than 41.99% of the average coding time in [19]. The method in [19] is without CU early split, and early terminates the PU prediction only by motion vector and residual, so it will lead to the rising BDBR and less time-saving in the sequences with small resolution and high motion, such as Class D. Figure 16 draws the RD curve comparison of HM.16.3, the proposed method, and [19] for PartyScene (S10) sequence.…”