2007
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2007.896770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient and Exact Reliability Evaluation for Networks With Imperfect Vertices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By cons, if the link fails, the cause of the failure cannot be known a priori, because it could be that one of the three components of the link has failed, and the relative conditional probabilities are given by Equations (5) and (6). Anyway, this link will be lost and therefore it will be deleted.…”
Section: Polygon-to-chain Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By cons, if the link fails, the cause of the failure cannot be known a priori, because it could be that one of the three components of the link has failed, and the relative conditional probabilities are given by Equations (5) and (6). Anyway, this link will be lost and therefore it will be deleted.…”
Section: Polygon-to-chain Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of them are called enumeration algorithms [2]- [12], summation of disjoint products [5] [8] [13], transformations of star-delta and delta-star structures [14], factoring & Reduction techniques [11] [14]- [22], binary decision diagrams methods [6] [7] [18] [23] [24], Bayesian models [25], etc. Simulation and approximating procedures have been used when the problem is tedious or when the exact value of the reliability is not necessary required [12] [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, A n )) can be constructed if a high-speed method for computing the availability A can be constructed. Many researchers have studied ways of computing the system availability [3,[7][8][9][10] but this problem is known to be NP-hard [3,13], which means that any existing method for exactly computing the system availability causes an exponential increase in the computing time if the system is large. The reason this problem is NP-hard is that if we could solve this problem in polynomial time, then we could also solve the problem of counting the number of cutsets in polynomial time, but this counting problem is known to be NP-hard [13].…”
Section: Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely a cut can be considered as a set of network components such that if these components fail, the system is down. Some research [1,22] shows that the number of cuts is usually much smaller than the number of paths for many practical systems, meaning that cut-based methods (i.e. to calculate the unreliability) have better performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%