Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1873951.1874268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient and robust near-duplicate detection in large and growing image data-sets

Abstract: Due to the increasing flood of digital images and the overall increase of storage capacity, large scale image databases are common these days. This work deals with the problem of finding replicas in image databases containing more than 100000 images. A clustering algorithm is developed that has linear runtime and can be carried out in parallel. We observe that with increasing size of the database, the problem of decreasing discrimination between high frequency images arises. Features of images with natural rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thomas and Julian Stottinger has a linear runtime and can be carried out in parallel [86]. They show that the quality of image retrieval depends on the quantization.…”
Section: Clustering Methods Used For the Nddmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thomas and Julian Stottinger has a linear runtime and can be carried out in parallel [86]. They show that the quality of image retrieval depends on the quantization.…”
Section: Clustering Methods Used For the Nddmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas and Julian Stottinger has a linear runtime and can be carried out in parallel [86]. shear (4).…”
Section: Near-duplicate Detection In Image Forensicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Search for the nearest column coefficients of the ScSIFT feature according to the index index. (5) Calculate the distance of for each column and according to formula (6). If ≤ , then the feature matching amount ∑ of the image which the column belongs to is increased by 1.…”
Section: Offline Sparse Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature [4], a SIFT feature filtering algorithm is proposed, which effectively reduces the SIFT feature points extracted from an image by the punishment mechanism, reduces the computational complexity, and improves the matching accuracy of the SIFT algorithm. In [5,6], the image is classified into different categories by using the clustering algorithm. It calculates the distance between the image to be detected and different clustering center and selects the nearest several types of images and exactly matches their SIFT characters, which reduces the SIFT feature matching data and improves the detection speed of the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%