Advances in Cryptology — EUROCRYPT ’93
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48285-7_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Anonymous Channel and All/Nothing Election Scheme

Abstract: The contribution of this paper are twofold. First, we present a n efficient computationally secure anonymous channel which has no problem of ciphertext length expansion. The length is irrelevant to the number of MIXes (control centers). It improves the efficiency of Chaum's election scheme based on the MIX net automatically. Second, we show an election scheme which satisfies fairness. That is, if some vote is disrupted, no one obtains any information about all the other votes. Each voter sends O(nk) bits so th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
144
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
144
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically the proposals of heuristically secure mix-nets [20,11,12,14,9] have been followed by discovery of security flaws [22,21,5,17,24].…”
Section: On the Provable Security Of Rpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historically the proposals of heuristically secure mix-nets [20,11,12,14,9] have been followed by discovery of security flaws [22,21,5,17,24].…”
Section: On the Provable Security Of Rpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For homomorphic cryptosystems, Park, Itoh and Kurosawa [20] introduced re-encryption mix-nets. Here the mix-servers generate a single joint public key with a verifiably secret shared secret key and decryption is replaced by re-encryption, followed by a joint verifiable decryption step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It performs by permuting messages, and by reencrypting or by decrypting them. The scheme requires a re-encryption mix net based on the El Gamal cryptosystem as introduced by Park et al [22]. However, in order to reduce the trust in the mix process, the mix net should be universally verifiable.…”
Section: Building Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first type, each voter sends the ballot to a trusted third party, the Voting Center, in an encrypted form. In the second type, each voter sends the ballot to the Voting Center through an anonymous channel [11,27].…”
Section: A2 Classification: the Two Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%