2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-4018(01)01530-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Bragg waveguide-grating analysis by quasi-rigorous approach based on Redheffer's star product

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the combined scattering matrix typically does not have any symmetry so it becomes necessary to store all four scattering parameters in the combined matrices. Two scattering matrices can be combined as illustrated in Figure 4 using the Redheffer star product [16,26,42]. It is derived by writing Eq.…”
Section: Redheffer Star Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that the combined scattering matrix typically does not have any symmetry so it becomes necessary to store all four scattering parameters in the combined matrices. Two scattering matrices can be combined as illustrated in Figure 4 using the Redheffer star product [16,26,42]. It is derived by writing Eq.…”
Section: Redheffer Star Productmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, scattering parameters are so common that the terms "S 11 " and "S 21 " are often used synonymously for "reflection" and "transmission." Despite this strong and longstanding convention, the CEM community is adopting inefficient and unconventional formalisms for scattering matrices for use in semianalytical methods [7,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. The majority of the literature on this topic appears in optics journals, where the benefits of semianalytical methods are more pronounced and the use of scattering parameters in experiments is less common.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Fourier Modal Method (FMM) [16][17][18] and Finite Difference based mode solver, OptiMode by OptiWave [19,20], are used in this work to determine the optical mode profiles of the waveguides (slab or channels). In both cases a calculation window of 10 μm × 3.5 μm is taken into account with a mesh size of 20 nm in x-direction and 5 nm in y-direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the parameters, i.e., the thickness of the layers, is determined using a mode solver based on the Fourier Modal Method [16][17][18]. Accurate mode profiles and confinement factors are calculated by Finite Difference mode solver, OptiWave [19,20], in order to avoid ripples due to Gibbs phenomenon inherent to FMM.…”
Section: Horizontal Slot Waveguide Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, not only the guided modes (which naturally vanish on both side of the boundary of the computational box), but also the radiation fields in the claddings which are attenuated in the perfectly matched-layers can be expanded into Fourier series. As a consequence, Method 2 can be used as an eigenmode solver for both guided and radiation modes, and in conjunction with an analytical integration in the z-direction by use of S-matrix scheme, 2 can solve many different problems related to the diffraction and propagation of guided wavwes by intricate non-periodic structures Silberstein et al 2001;Tervo et al 2001). For two-dimensional problems, this approach has been used to design short tapers which largely reduced out-of-plane radiation losses at the interface between conventional z-invariant slab waveguides and dielectric Bragg mirrors (Ctyroky et al 2002;Lalanne and Hugonin 2003), to study very low losses of photonic-crystal waveguides resulting from the light tunnelling through the finite thickness of the photonic crystal (Li and Ho 2004) or to compute Bloch waves of periodic grating waveguides (Cao et al 2002).…”
Section: Fourier Expansion Techniques For Implementing Mode Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%