2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icdsp.2011.6004970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient burst error correction method for application in low frequency channels and data storage units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, it becomes more difficult to use specialized devices. For a USB port and approximately equal transmitter and receiver temperatures, the critical threshold is six units: h=6 [8].…”
Section: Development Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, it becomes more difficult to use specialized devices. For a USB port and approximately equal transmitter and receiver temperatures, the critical threshold is six units: h=6 [8].…”
Section: Development Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative existing method [7,8,9] is capable of correcting double synchronization errors and uses a two component correction code. With the bit values of the first component, the fragments of the transmitted packet that contain errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If all errors were random, almost all frames would be corrupted. However, if dealing with burst error events of size 1000, only 1 frame in 1000 would be corrupted [3]. The disadvantage that comes with the appearance of burst error events is that error detection and correction as well as analytical modeling of the specific patterns is much more difficult to achieve compared with the case of random errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach over the last years is the use of simple weighted checksum for error correction [3]. The based on logical weighted checksum approach for single burst error correction [3] is more effective in comparison to Reed-Solomon codes: used less control bits, this approach allowed to red m to .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation