2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient calibration of instantaneous cutting force coefficients and runout parameters for general end mills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A larger force coefficient at a smaller axial depth of cut was also found by Erdim et al [24]. Several studies [25][26][27] also reported that the cutting force coefficients tend to increase the cut thickness decreases.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Abs With Z-mappingsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…A larger force coefficient at a smaller axial depth of cut was also found by Erdim et al [24]. Several studies [25][26][27] also reported that the cutting force coefficients tend to increase the cut thickness decreases.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Abs With Z-mappingsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…(10a) and (10b) need to be calibrated for each cutter-workpiece material pair in order to calculate the ball-end milling forces. Various approaches for calibrating the cutting force coefficients have been proposed in the literature, such as: processing the instantaneous cutting forces rather than the average cutting forces [36], analyzing the experimental force data in the frequency domain [37], separating the cutting forces into nominal and perturbation components [38], using force data generated from a finite element model [39], and considering the negative effect of cutter runout [40].…”
Section: Calibration Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the design accuracy of the whole process, including fixtures, cutting tools and machine tools, can be improved to provide a basis for 1 formulating the cutting parameters and optimising the geometric parameters of the tools used. 1 Common milling force models are empirical, mechanical, finite element (FE) and neural networks based on artificial intelligence and so on. [2][3][4][5] In terms of milling force modelling for stainless steel, through the single factor experiments testing the influence of the factors, including milling depth, line space and feed per tooth, on milling force, three-dimensional (3D) milling force data were obtained by Li et al based on the characteristics of stainless steel materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%