2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-018-2278-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient computation of the transitive closure size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing works can be divided into two categories:(1) TC size computation [18], [20], which computes the accurate TC size.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Existing works can be divided into two categories:(1) TC size computation [18], [20], which computes the accurate TC size.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculating the accurate TC size using fast binary matrix multiplication [2], [20] has time complexity (| | 2.38 ) and space complexity (| | 2 ), which cannot scale to large graphs due to the expensive computation and space overheads. In [18], Xian Tang et al proposed an algorithm based on pathdecomposition. The result is a set of paths.…”
Section: ) Tc Size Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Algorithm: We use Algorithm 2 to compute the partial 2hop distance label, which works in three steps: (1) In line 1, it computes the size of transitive closure T of G by the approach proposed in [23]. (2) In line 3, it sorts all nodes based on degree to get a node processing order.…”
Section: A Partial 2hop Distance Label Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is computing the size of TC, the other is computing the exact number of reachable queries that can be answered by the partial 2-hop labels, which we call as the coverage size. Considering that TC size computation can be efficiently solved by existing works [27], the difficulty of reachability ratio computation lies in how to efficiently compute the coverage size. The naive way is first generating partial 2-hop labels based on k selected hop-nodes, then getting the coverage size by checking all node pairs using the partial 2-hop labels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%