1995
DOI: 10.1142/9789812795830_0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Computation of Three-dimensional Protein Structures in Solution from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data Using the Program DIANA and the Supporting Programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
282
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
282
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…NOESY cross-peak intensities were converted into upls and lols using the program CALIBA (Gu È ntert et al, 1991) with the modi®cation that pseudo-atom corrections are set negative for lols. The atoms and the pseudo-atoms of the non-standard fragments used in the calculations (see the next section for details) were introduced into the program.…”
Section: Calculation Of Restraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOESY cross-peak intensities were converted into upls and lols using the program CALIBA (Gu È ntert et al, 1991) with the modi®cation that pseudo-atom corrections are set negative for lols. The atoms and the pseudo-atoms of the non-standard fragments used in the calculations (see the next section for details) were introduced into the program.…”
Section: Calculation Of Restraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program DIANA (Giintert et al, 1991) was used to identify and remove redundant structure information. Subsequently, the standard protocol in X-PLOR 3.1 (Briinger, 1992) for protein structure calculations was applied using, first, distance geometry; second, 3 ps of simulated annealing at 2,000 K, followed by 5 ps of simulated annealing while cooling to 100 K (Nilges et al, 1988) in the simulated annealing procedure; and third, 4.7 ps of simulated annealing while cooling from 1,000 K to 100 K in the refinement procedure.…”
Section: Structure Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of the BID protein was defined based on ~1700 NMR-derived distance constraints. This included 1350 structurally relevant NOE-based constraints, 275 dihedral angle constraints measured from J-coupling constants and local bond geometry (Guntert et al, 1991), and constraints from 56 hydrogen bonds implied by hydrogen-deuterium exchange experiments and local secondary structure. This corresponds to an average density of ~15 constraints per residue in all regions of secondary structure.…”
Section: Structure Determination Of Bidmentioning
confidence: 99%