2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient conic fitting with an analytical Polar-N-Direction geometric distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially for the case of Sampson-based methods, the visual observations corroborate that Sampson distance may only be appropriate for data with smaller noise levels as was mentioned in[12]. Therefore, careful attention must be given when integrating the Sampson distance into ellipse fitting cost functions, especially at larger noise levels (see Figure3of[34] as an example). The confocal hyperbola method on the other hand, is almost indistinguishable from the true geometric distance in the presented three arrangements (the confocal hyperbola, shown in red lies almost exactly underneath Chernov's distance shown in blue).…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Especially for the case of Sampson-based methods, the visual observations corroborate that Sampson distance may only be appropriate for data with smaller noise levels as was mentioned in[12]. Therefore, careful attention must be given when integrating the Sampson distance into ellipse fitting cost functions, especially at larger noise levels (see Figure3of[34] as an example). The confocal hyperbola method on the other hand, is almost indistinguishable from the true geometric distance in the presented three arrangements (the confocal hyperbola, shown in red lies almost exactly underneath Chernov's distance shown in blue).…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…An additional limitation of these algorithms is that they cannot obtain successful results in images where the center circle does not appear complete. Alternatively, some authors [35] have proposed strategies using Least Squares Fitting (LSF) methods [36]. However, they are also too sensitive to the presence of data that do not belong to the ellipse.…”
Section: Line Mark Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A circle is imaged as a conic by a perspective camera. The conic from our markers is fitted by a polar-n-direction geometric distance method [28]. Then, the representation matrix defined in (1) is obtained.…”
Section: Designed Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where π is denoted as the camera model. If K(R, t) are accurate and the fitted conics C on the image plane have no noise, the distance [28] between p and C, denoted as d 2 (p, C), is zero. Otherwise, d 2 (p, C) isn't.…”
Section: Camera Pose Tracking With Nonlinear Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation