2003
DOI: 10.21236/ada461126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Consistency for Erasure-Coded Data via Versioning Servers

Abstract: We thank the members and companies of the PDL Consortium (including EMC, Hewlett-Packard, Hitachi, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Network Appliance, Oracle, Panasas, Seagate, Sun, and Veritas) for their interest, insights, feedback, and support. We thank IBM and Intel for hardware grants supporting our research efforts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We present a methodology that easily transforms several existing Byzantine protocols for static quorum systems [9,13,14,17,18] into corresponding protocols that operate correctly when the administrator is allowed to add or remove servers from the quorum system, as well as to change its resilience threshold. Performing the transformation does not require extensive changes to the protocols: all that is required is to replace calls to the Q-RPC primitive used in static protocols with calls to DQ-RPC, a new primitive that in the static case behaves like Q-RPC but can handle operations across quorums that…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We present a methodology that easily transforms several existing Byzantine protocols for static quorum systems [9,13,14,17,18] into corresponding protocols that operate correctly when the administrator is allowed to add or remove servers from the quorum system, as well as to change its resilience threshold. Performing the transformation does not require extensive changes to the protocols: all that is required is to replace calls to the Q-RPC primitive used in static protocols with calls to DQ-RPC, a new primitive that in the static case behaves like Q-RPC but can handle operations across quorums that…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They guarantee atomic semantics in an unreliable asynchronous network despite crash failures. name can tolerate (crash,Byz) client failures semantics servers required crash (f, 0), without signatures crash atomic 2f + 1 U-dissemination [17] (0, b), using signatures crash atomic 3b + 1 hybrid-d [9] (f, b), using signatures crash atomic 2f + 3b + 1 U-masking [18] (0, b), without signatures correct partial-atomic 4 4b + 1 hybrid-m [9] (f, b), without signatures correct partial-atomic 4 2f + 4b + 1 Phalanx [14] (0, b), without client signatures Byzantine partial-atomic 4 4b + 1 hybrid Phalanx (f, b), without client signatures Byzantine partial-atomic 4 2f + 4b + 1 Figure 1: List of quorum protocols that can be made dynamic using DQ-RPC…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have demonstrated instances across a wide range of data encoding schemes, numbers of failures, etc. [Wylie03a,Wylie03b,Goodson03b,Goodson03c]. 2…”
Section: Final Prototype Achieves Performance and Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FarSite [1] is a distributed serverless file system that uses voting-based algorithms to tolerate Byzantine failures. Self-* is also a serverless file system that uses quorum-based erasure-coding algorithms [12,16]. Figure 1: The structure of a FAB system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%